From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Jingxiang Zeng <linuszeng@tencent.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
muchun.song@linux.dev, chengming.zhou@linux.dev,
kasong@tencent.com, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/list_lru: make the case where mlru is NULL as unlikely
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 08:23:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ngowzrpvvfklkyswlcg7x6gfiqjhxaankkx3jgo3pmvrbzbzdv@jqwfqbjxxvv3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250225153020.2514685-1-jingxiangzeng.cas@gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 11:30:20PM +0800, Jingxiang Zeng wrote:
> From: Zeng Jingxiang <linuszeng@tencent.com>
>
> In the following memcg_list_lru_alloc() function, mlru here is almost
> always NULL, so in most cases this should save a function call, mark
> mlru as unlikely to optimize the code.
> do {
> xas_lock_irqsave(&xas, flags);
> if (!xas_load(&xas) && !css_is_dying(&pos->css)) {
> xas_store(&xas, mlru);
> if (!xas_error(&xas))
> mlru = NULL;
> }
> xas_unlock_irqrestore(&xas, flags);
> } while (xas_nomem(&xas, GFP_KERNEL));
> > if (mlru)
> kfree(mlru);
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412290924.UTP7GH2Z-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Zeng Jingxiang <linuszeng@tencent.com>
> ---
> mm/list_lru.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/list_lru.c b/mm/list_lru.c
> index 064d2018e265..e7e13513ff8e 100644
> --- a/mm/list_lru.c
> +++ b/mm/list_lru.c
> @@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ static int memcg_list_lru_alloc(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct list_lru *lru)
> }
> xas_unlock_irqrestore(&xas, flags);
> } while (xas_nomem(&xas, GFP_KERNEL));
> - if (mlru)
> + if (unlikely(mlru))
> kfree(mlru);
The report is saying not to check at all. So, just remove the check and
simply call kfree(mlru) as it handles the NULL check efficiently.
> set_active_memcg(cur);
> } while (pos != memcg && !css_is_dying(&pos->css));
> --
> 2.43.5
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-25 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-25 15:30 Jingxiang Zeng
2025-02-25 16:23 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2025-02-26 1:11 ` Johannes Weiner
2025-02-26 2:09 ` jingxiang zeng
2025-02-26 21:08 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-02-27 8:03 ` jingxiang zeng
2025-02-28 16:30 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-28 16:33 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-28 18:48 ` Shakeel Butt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ngowzrpvvfklkyswlcg7x6gfiqjhxaankkx3jgo3pmvrbzbzdv@jqwfqbjxxvv3 \
--to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=linuszeng@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox