From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B14CC54E58 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:57:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 8D8446B006E; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 11:57:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 888616B00CB; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 11:57:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 72AC76B0071; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 11:57:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0016.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.16]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 622548D0057 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 11:57:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin24.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CCC1A0293 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:57:22 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 81888841524.24.783E945 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.11]) by imf22.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F3A7C0020 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:57:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf22.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=VhSJrfm0; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=none (imf22.hostedemail.com: domain of kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 198.175.65.11) smtp.mailfrom=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1710259040; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=c3urYGfKuJPLeoHA6U+tKSjt1CN+KM4GYVCJY2zaAA8=; b=2yW74JMS5I5p96Noz4sZZiQcZt+1BooEvmqw8AMGuNzIj2Omxw7+++CmXgSj/XLiWOVuxk Se+MAShMwjc5edgQZVKj4BSNosyLFLhGZ89cO6aNc5+PQ+r+wgWuIW+JUxe13Mvb5cOmqB 8Vx8wGJj10QqEJG1N45tcrxJVcvvwtM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf22.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=VhSJrfm0; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=none (imf22.hostedemail.com: domain of kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 198.175.65.11) smtp.mailfrom=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1710259040; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=qZw4fui1RyhmMqE3vVaUisdn632y62Itg/kyMcVxKXcTR2ti2DbQuy3hnCCJQwtTJIfnOw yO/93VCHle337dqH9oxtXgenTWF3hLEIwXmWP31D5F8MsbRdJzQBzuT0tAMtDDe+dzVuL/ 9xur8RHVdkXiVs11FjIOEsugrecYnuA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1710259040; x=1741795040; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=mNMHK1T1QnXwQ0bnvHui2hdAh/gJvX+CqXtKZELLAzU=; b=VhSJrfm06szd7Dauug9GQGweHLJ6jQ+2LJnVZ9Kn4jjyLEf4ctG/aqjC VrIYL+kzBAKCUFWOPL2rMuix7qmMCz2syfSzCgV2NTPviS+Mp3i9Rv8jX yEr3WclL1fWT4okaa+B0cIpA5w8rCKVbTO2a3jaxiWEZhDbaHeeuPevWA 5XEhsOFfaU6zHcFwWUGy1HBYMP/xacGKf3T/hPo8PPLAt/YXLPNwO2R6M gd9c8aEOBoAKZRYTXFXT+4rH7mLRtHnWRoA6QWhicCgenAX7DOKnYEvwX teqFISzOwcOmYnv5ay3TnxhwJqcHSAKutzAkCtjev7cP3qh9yqdDRygeL w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11011"; a="15531076" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,119,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="15531076" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Mar 2024 08:57:17 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11011"; a="937051909" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,119,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="937051909" Received: from black.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.28]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Mar 2024 08:57:08 -0700 Received: by black.fi.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 97E3C2B7; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:57:07 +0200 (EET) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:57:07 +0200 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Pasha Tatashin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, x86@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, brauner@kernel.org, bristot@redhat.com, bsegall@google.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, dianders@chromium.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, eric.devolder@oracle.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, hch@infradead.org, hpa@zytor.com, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, jpoimboe@kernel.org, jroedel@suse.de, juri.lelli@redhat.com, kent.overstreet@linux.dev, kinseyho@google.com, lstoakes@gmail.com, luto@kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de, mic@digikod.net, michael.christie@oracle.com, mingo@redhat.com, mjguzik@gmail.com, mst@redhat.com, npiggin@gmail.com, peterz@infradead.org, pmladek@suse.com, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, surenb@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, urezki@gmail.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, vschneid@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC 05/14] fork: check charging success before zeroing stack Message-ID: References: <20240311164638.2015063-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> <20240311164638.2015063-6-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240311164638.2015063-6-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 9F3A7C0020 X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Stat-Signature: hj7k3rug5pput8sr1pttj4wxeuyqnf6g X-HE-Tag: 1710259039-152121 X-HE-Meta: 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 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000773, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 04:46:29PM +0000, Pasha Tatashin wrote: > No need to do zero cahced stack if memcg charge fails, so move the Typo. -- Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov