From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Jim Zhao <jimzhao.ai@gmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page-writeback: Consolidate wb_thresh bumping logic into __wb_calc_thresh
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 17:07:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mqe2boksd5ztaz7xyabyp4sbtufxthcnrbwrjayghe4hpfbp4w@wjqsm467sjp5> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64a44636-16ec-4a10-aeb6-e327b7f989c2@roeck-us.net>
On Tue 14-01-25 07:01:08, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 1/14/25 05:19, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Mon 13-01-25 15:05:25, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 06:05:39PM +0800, Jim Zhao wrote:
> > > > Address the feedback from "mm/page-writeback: raise wb_thresh to prevent
> > > > write blocking with strictlimit"(39ac99852fca98ca44d52716d792dfaf24981f53).
> > > > The wb_thresh bumping logic is scattered across wb_position_ratio,
> > > > __wb_calc_thresh, and wb_update_dirty_ratelimit. For consistency,
> > > > consolidate all wb_thresh bumping logic into __wb_calc_thresh.
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jim Zhao <jimzhao.ai@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > This patch triggers a boot failure with one of my 'sheb' boot tests.
> > > It is seen when trying to boot from flash (mtd). The log says
> > >
> > > ...
> > > Starting network: 8139cp 0000:00:02.0 eth0: link down
> > > udhcpc: started, v1.33.0
> > > EXT2-fs (mtdblock3): error: ext2_check_folio: bad entry in directory #363: : directory entry across blocks - offset=0, inode=27393, rec_len=3072, name_len=2
> > > udhcpc: sending discover
> > > udhcpc: sending discover
> > > udhcpc: sending discover
> > > EXT2-fs (mtdblock3): error: ext2_check_folio: bad entry in directory #363: : directory entry across blocks - offset=0, inode=27393, rec_len=3072, name_len=2
> >
> > Thanks for report! Uh, I have to say I'm very confused by this. It is clear
> > than when ext2 detects the directory corruption (we fail checking directory
> > inode 363 which is likely /etc/init.d/), the boot fails in interesting
> > ways. What is unclear is how the commit can possibly cause ext2 directory
> > corruption. If you didn't verify reverting the commit fixes the issue, I'd
> > be suspecting bad bisection but that obviously isn't the case :-)
> >
> > Ext2 is storing directory data in the page cache so at least it uses the
> > subsystem which the patch impacts but how writeback throttling can cause
> > ext2 directory corruption is beyond me. BTW, do you recreate the root
> > filesystem before each boot? How exactly?
>
> I use pre-built root file systems. For sheb, they are at
> https://github.com/groeck/linux-build-test/tree/master/rootfs/sheb
Thanks. So the problematic directory is /usr/share/udhcpc/ where we
read apparently bogus metadata at the beginning of that directory.
> I don't think this is related to ext2 itself. Booting an ext2 image from
> ata/ide drive works.
Interesting this is specific to mtd. I'll read the patch carefully again if
something rings a bell.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-15 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-21 10:05 Jim Zhao
2025-01-13 23:05 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-01-14 13:19 ` Jan Kara
2025-01-14 15:01 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-01-15 16:07 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2025-01-15 16:28 ` Jan Kara
2025-01-15 16:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-01-15 16:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-01-16 14:56 ` Jan Kara
2025-01-16 16:05 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-10-07 16:17 ` Joshua Watt
2025-10-08 11:14 ` Jan Kara
2025-10-08 14:49 ` Joshua Watt
2025-10-08 23:14 ` Joshua Watt
2025-10-09 8:38 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mqe2boksd5ztaz7xyabyp4sbtufxthcnrbwrjayghe4hpfbp4w@wjqsm467sjp5 \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jimzhao.ai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox