From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
To: prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: lkp@intel.com, prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master 13230/13643] arch/riscv/errata/andes/errata.c:46:14: warning: result of comparison of constant 9223372036854811205 with expression of type 'unsigned long' is always true
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 17:57:49 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mhng-809e676e-6b96-4bc5-9dd1-c6b31d53f179@palmer-ri-x1c9> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+V-a8v6P_BXKd+XzCToczNOV9g9jS=r3isisSAuh=xXfZ32UQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 05 Sep 2023 03:20:17 PDT (-0700), prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 10:58 PM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
>> head: a47fc304d2b678db1a5d760a7d644dac9b067752
>> commit: f2863f30d1b05e5ecf61c063609cb974954d47f8 [13230/13643] riscv: errata: Add Andes alternative ports
>> config: riscv-randconfig-r015-20230902 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230902/202309020548.rbrIJu6S-lkp@intel.com/config)
>> compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 4a5ac14ee968ff0ad5d2cc1ffa0299048db4c88a)
>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230902/202309020548.rbrIJu6S-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>>
>> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
>> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
>> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309020548.rbrIJu6S-lkp@intel.com/
>>
>> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>> arch/riscv/errata/andes/errata.c:29:16: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct sbiret'
>> 29 | struct sbiret ret;
>> | ^
>> arch/riscv/errata/andes/errata.c:29:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct sbiret'
>> 29 | struct sbiret ret;
>> | ^
>> arch/riscv/errata/andes/errata.c:35:8: error: call to undeclared function 'sbi_ecall'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>> 35 | ret = sbi_ecall(ANDESTECH_SBI_EXT_ANDES, ANDES_SBI_EXT_IOCP_SW_WORKAROUND,
>> | ^
>> >> arch/riscv/errata/andes/errata.c:46:14: warning: result of comparison of constant 9223372036854811205 with expression of type 'unsigned long' is always true [-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
>> 46 | if (arch_id != ANDESTECH_AX45MP_MARCHID || impid != ANDESTECH_AX45MP_MIMPID)
>> | ~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> 1 warning and 2 errors generated.
>>
> After applying the below four patches we shouldn't be seeing this
> randconfig warnings:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/patch/20230901105111.311200-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/patch/20230901105858.311745-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/patch/20230901110320.312674-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/patch/20230901110936.313171-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com/
Thanks, these are in the testing queue. I'll pick them up for the merge
window unless something goes off the rails.
+Geert, who acked the SOC one.
>
> Cheers,
> Prabhakar
>
>>
>> vim +46 arch/riscv/errata/andes/errata.c
>>
>> 40
>> 41 static bool errata_probe_iocp(unsigned int stage, unsigned long arch_id, unsigned long impid)
>> 42 {
>> 43 if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ERRATA_ANDES_CMO))
>> 44 return false;
>> 45
>> > 46 if (arch_id != ANDESTECH_AX45MP_MARCHID || impid != ANDESTECH_AX45MP_MIMPID)
>> 47 return false;
>> 48
>> 49 if (!ax45mp_iocp_sw_workaround())
>> 50 return false;
>> 51
>> 52 /* Set this just to make core cbo code happy */
>> 53 riscv_cbom_block_size = 1;
>> 54 riscv_noncoherent_supported();
>> 55
>> 56 return true;
>> 57 }
>> 58
>>
>> --
>> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
>> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-06 0:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-01 21:57 kernel test robot
2023-09-05 10:20 ` Lad, Prabhakar
2023-09-06 0:57 ` Palmer Dabbelt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mhng-809e676e-6b96-4bc5-9dd1-c6b31d53f179@palmer-ri-x1c9 \
--to=palmer@rivosinc.com \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com \
--cc=prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox