linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
To: rdunlap@infradead.org, rppt@kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, sunnanyong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] riscv: TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE: depends on MMU
Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 16:08:15 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <mhng-184591e7-860d-4bec-86c1-7a26ad6e806e@palmerdabbelt-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a2953d37-aaf3-3db5-f4a3-488a8ca7f245@infradead.org>

On Tue, 25 May 2021 08:40:10 PDT (-0700), rdunlap@infradead.org wrote:
> On 5/25/21 3:33 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>> On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 05:13:02PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> Fix a Kconfig warning and many build errors:
>>>
>>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for COMPACTION
>>>   Depends on [n]: MMU [=n]
>>>   Selected by [y]:
>>>   - TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE [=y] && HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE [=y]
>>>
>>> and the subseqent thousands of build errors and warnings.
>>>
>>> Fixes: e88b333142e4 ("riscv: mm: add THP support on 64-bit")
>>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
>>> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
>>> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
>>> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
>>> Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
>>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>>> Cc: Nanyong Sun <sunnanyong@huawei.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>>> ---
>>> I really think that mm/Kconfig should have "depends on MMU" for
>>> TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE, but commit 15626062f4a9 from 2012
>>> ("thp, x86: introduce HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE") thought
>>> differently. I.e., mm/Kconfig should be protecting all arches
>>> against this Kconfig problem.
>>
>> We could
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
>> index 02d44e3420f5..85bc8bf32e7b 100644
>> --- a/mm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
>> @@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ config NOMMU_INITIAL_TRIM_EXCESS
>>
>>  config TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
>>  	bool "Transparent Hugepage Support"
>> -	depends on HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
>> +	depends on MMU && HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
>>  	select COMPACTION
>>  	select XARRAY_MULTI
>>  	help
>>
>> but in a sense HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE should imply that MMU is
>> selected :)
>
> Yes, I had this patch before the one that I sent but decided against it
> based on history.

IMO 15626062f4a9 ("thp, x86: introduce HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE") 
is really saying "the arches that have transparent huge pages are MMU=y, 
so we don't need the extra check".  That seems reasonable as of when the 
code landed, and while arm has MMU=n and THP it already depends on MMU 
(via ARM_LPAE, which seems kind of natural there).

The generic version seems fine to me, but I'm going to take this one now 
so we can avoid the build issues.

>>>  arch/riscv/Kconfig |    2 +-
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> --- linux-next-20210524.orig/arch/riscv/Kconfig
>>> +++ linux-next-20210524/arch/riscv/Kconfig
>>> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ config RISCV
>>>  	select SYSCTL_EXCEPTION_TRACE
>>>  	select THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK
>>>  	select UACCESS_MEMCPY if !MMU
>>> -	select HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE if 64BIT
>>> +	select HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE if 64BIT && MMU
>>>
>>>  config ARCH_MMAP_RND_BITS_MIN
>>>  	default 18 if 64BIT
>>>
>>
>
> thanks.


      reply	other threads:[~2021-05-29 23:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-25  0:13 Randy Dunlap
2021-05-25 10:33 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-25 15:40   ` Randy Dunlap
2021-05-29 23:08     ` Palmer Dabbelt [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=mhng-184591e7-860d-4bec-86c1-7a26ad6e806e@palmerdabbelt-glaptop \
    --to=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox