From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD538C433E6 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 20:26:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E6CE64EF0 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 20:26:40 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7E6CE64EF0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dabbelt.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id DDF236B007B; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 15:26:39 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id D909A6B007D; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 15:26:39 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id CA6BD6B007E; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 15:26:39 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0027.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.27]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B43A76B007B for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 15:26:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin03.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB47181AF5CC for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 20:26:39 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77861552118.03.A4EDAF8 Received: from mail-pl1-f170.google.com (mail-pl1-f170.google.com [209.85.214.170]) by imf12.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97305ED for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 20:26:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pl1-f170.google.com with SMTP id a24so5880968plm.11 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 12:26:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dabbelt-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:subject:in-reply-to:cc:from:to:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UUj1Jx6hbXP63KTKbzytVO1JjoCuC+IadU7GiOtGKzI=; b=tNUrzW4gkg7IKO3AYSU9JOaHrNm0YcunhmUNZ+nUVdPLAn/vJ2kP5za0JqynGPsAaO YGEWB1wGdOL2k2JqicMC6KUEhUPCV35bBAWUvEVCfwxWvhCux0AGwUXjTtFL4Jp3F7X+ 7QjCt4/0GhwIMSXgNHjEN/7odKZHqmkJgKiojwOqJm8/0hoFMDrhHydlBr01dygJRIO6 Bg0jVUnf4hpKV91hqDGwjgGct9kwdTFRr8uXv3/UMUopnIEbQTSqGrJOIOvpUD2Faxgw fM6xujdf7icw+LJxjBZwpGl4Cp+2qQ6rqe6oSbpG9f85Y3uppMT+P8oscBlQbMta+lsB qfwg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:subject:in-reply-to:cc:from:to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UUj1Jx6hbXP63KTKbzytVO1JjoCuC+IadU7GiOtGKzI=; b=We5oGXN5m56yVNNLa4q4QolP60tV+FJFQ47Eh5+vdI76AYa7gknWixZUQTqrJnwxu1 Ym77ThlMeaJoqNQ9LzCSwD7OppYJlcwa+UCTKMXdzlPRae75+WI+JSEEsAIboWwSH0EI sEJ5m7yqwe2Tmda0rhAGaageGMCxpurv1ugAmygR+ajbyDNL4zVL0FTQksUjT5DQuLnA 8GjF5oAw0Wd7WEUDJEq005oBlaQhjUHLeflmhIFk7uwGWxrBzmO9k8PL8M8aZZ606+SE zDwRgWKyR7TzVIW1fduLtpW1XOqXSaX68d4i8VzQ5lnzHaL7Cw7XZw90/dr48I6FefEn ZJ9A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532rsMNyJba7DnRQqVD5PZwZBJeQ7LCE96yfIx55igpJ60gwOfbI hyroPm2Ijcvf01PThR3fjbhsgg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyO2yfNEHAp/1XNZFY9ANEJ+MLxH/nX6lve03b7m3MU0d3iF/jgv6/RMxwMjT2xGDmNkmjw/g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:24d:b029:e3:cfa7:e308 with SMTP id 71-20020a170902024db02900e3cfa7e308mr4504843plc.82.1614371197993; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 12:26:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (76-210-143-223.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [76.210.143.223]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j201sm11059892pfd.143.2021.02.26.12.26.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 12:26:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 12:26:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 12:26:36 PST (-0800) Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] BUILD REGRESSION d01f2f7e35573049673b71e18be7abfe3f80323f In-Reply-To: CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, lkp@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, Paul Walmsley From: Palmer Dabbelt To: atishp@atishpatra.org Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 (MHng) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 97305ED X-Stat-Signature: e8rwz6z3zhnqcrppnp534mpoma1zncd1 Received-SPF: none (dabbelt.com>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf12; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=mail-pl1-f170.google.com; client-ip=209.85.214.170 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1614371192-897783 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:43:21 PST (-0800), atishp@atishpatra.org wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 11:13 AM Andrew Morton > wrote: >> >> On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 23:45:18 +0800 kernel test robot w= rote: >> >> > tree/branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/li= nux-next.git master >> > branch HEAD: d01f2f7e35573049673b71e18be7abfe3f80323f Add linux-nex= t specific files for 20210226 >> > >> > ... >> > >> > page_alloc.c:(.text+0xe028): undefined reference to `node_reclaim_di= stance' >> > riscv32-linux-ld: page_alloc.c:(.text+0xe02c): undefined reference t= o `node_reclaim_distance' >> > >> > ... >> > >> > |-- riscv-randconfig-p001-20210226 >> > | |-- page_alloc.c:(.text):undefined-reference-to-node_reclaim_dis= tance >> > | `-- riscv32-linux-ld:page_alloc.c:(.text):undefined-reference-to= -node_reclaim_distance >> >> I assume the riscv randconfig managed to create a .config with >> CONFIG_NUMA=3Dn, CONFIG_SMP=3Dy. Configuration doesn't make a lot of >> sense, unless someone has a single-CPU machine with cpuless nodes... >> >> Could the riscv maintainers please test and merge this? >> > > Yeah. This was discussed a week back. > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2021-February/004640.h= tml > > @Palmer Dabbelt Is the fix merged in the PR ? Sorry, I thought I'd sent out the fix for this but forgot to. This just = got merged to Linus' tree, and looking at my code I forgot about it because I wasn't actually seeing these build failures reproduce locally. Though looking at my patches (which I just sent) I was fixing some closely-related isuse, so I'm going to just pick this up. I just sent it= out, it's on fixes. > >> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig~a >> +++ a/arch/riscv/Kconfig >> @@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ endchoice >> # Common NUMA Features >> config NUMA >> bool "NUMA Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support" >> + depends on SMP >> select GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA >> select OF_NUMA >> select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING >> _ >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> linux-riscv mailing list >> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv