From: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
To: "Pratik R. Sampat" <prsampat@amd.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
ardb@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com,
osalvador@suse.de, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
michael.roth@amd.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] mm: Add support for unaccepted memory hotplug
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 17:48:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <maleev6ofzlnhi3rmqjawlllxkda4mrgwmb6msz5gz77klfrxl@adpqtakqrxrj> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f60d968e-6be3-4bad-8bf4-8500ad039817@amd.com>
On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 11:15:13AM -0600, Pratik R. Sampat wrote:
>
>
> On 11/27/25 11:40 AM, Kiryl Shutsemau wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 04:27:29PM -0600, Pratik R. Sampat wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11/26/25 5:12 AM, Kiryl Shutsemau wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 11:57:51AM -0600, Pratik R. Sampat wrote:
> >>>> The unaccepted memory structure currently only supports accepting memory
> >>>> present at boot time. The unaccepted table uses a fixed-size bitmap
> >>>> reserved in memblock based on the initial memory layout, preventing
> >>>> dynamic addition of memory ranges after boot. This causes guest
> >>>> termination when memory is hot-added in a secure virtual machine due to
> >>>> accessing pages that have not transitioned to private before use.
> >>>
> >>> How does the hot-pluggable memory look in EFI memory map? I thought
> >>> hot-pluggable ranges suppose to be declared thare. The cleanest solution
> >>> would be to have hot-pluggable and unaccepted indicated in EFI memory,
> >>> so we can size bitmap accordingly upfront.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I'm not quite sure if I fully understand. Do you mean to refer to the
> >> EFI_MEMORY_HOT_PLUGGABLE attribute that is used for cold plugged boot
> >> memory? If so, wouldn't it still be desirable to increase the size of
> >> the bitmap to what was marked as hotpluggable initially?
> >
> > I just don't understand how hotpluggable memory presented in EFI memory
> > map in presence of unaccepted memory. If not-yet-plugged memory marked
> > as unaccepted we can preallocate bitmap upfront and make unaccepted
> > memory transparent wrt hotplug.
>
> If memory that hasn't been plugged yet never gets plugged in or is only
> partially plugged in, wouldn't we be wasting space by preallocating
> the bitmap upfront? Or would that not be a concern in favor of
> transparency?
4k per 64GiB of physical address space should be low enough to ignore, no?
We can look into optimizing it out when it is an actual, not imaginary
problem.
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-01 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-25 17:57 [RFC PATCH 0/4] SEV-SNP Unaccepted Memory Hotplug Pratik R. Sampat
2025-11-25 17:57 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] efi/libstub: Decouple memory bitmap from the unaccepted table Pratik R. Sampat
2025-11-26 11:08 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-11-26 22:27 ` Pratik R. Sampat
2025-11-27 17:29 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-11-25 17:57 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] mm: Add support for unaccepted memory hotplug Pratik R. Sampat
2025-11-26 11:12 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-11-26 22:27 ` Pratik R. Sampat
2025-11-27 17:40 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-11-28 9:34 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-01 17:15 ` Pratik R. Sampat
2025-12-01 18:25 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-01 19:35 ` Pratik R. Sampat
2025-12-01 17:15 ` Pratik R. Sampat
2025-12-01 17:48 ` Kiryl Shutsemau [this message]
2025-12-01 17:58 ` Pratik R. Sampat
2025-11-26 22:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-11-27 17:35 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-11-27 18:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-11-28 9:30 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-28 11:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-12-01 9:18 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-01 11:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-12-01 18:32 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-01 19:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-12-01 20:10 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-01 20:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-12-01 20:36 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-03 14:46 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2025-12-03 15:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-12-03 15:00 ` Rik van Riel
2025-11-28 9:32 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-01 17:21 ` Pratik R. Sampat
2025-12-01 18:36 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-01 19:35 ` Pratik R. Sampat
2025-11-25 17:57 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86/sev: Introduce hotplug-aware SNP page state validation Pratik R. Sampat
2025-11-25 17:57 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] mm: Add support for unaccepted memory hot-remove Pratik R. Sampat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=maleev6ofzlnhi3rmqjawlllxkda4mrgwmb6msz5gz77klfrxl@adpqtakqrxrj \
--to=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=prsampat@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox