linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
	 Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org,  brauner@kernel.org,  corbet@lwn.net,
	graf@amazon.com,  jgg@ziepe.ca,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,  linux-mm@kvack.org,
	masahiroy@kernel.org,  ojeda@kernel.org,  rdunlap@infradead.org,
	tj@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 5/7] kho: don't unpreserve memory during abort
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 17:48:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <mafs0sef8e1wd.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+CK2bARUpZaymPTusZWM-kzXcUp_d1UK9nUudu3tHitpeAH5Q@mail.gmail.com> (Pasha Tatashin's message of "Fri, 24 Oct 2025 11:33:26 -0400")

On Fri, Oct 24 2025, Pasha Tatashin wrote:

>> If any of the kho_preserve_pages() fails, the notifier block will fail,
>> cause an abort, and eventually all memory will be unpreserved.
>
> This is a wrong behavior. Why should the memory that I preserved be
> unpreserved if there is finailziation failure or abort? reserve_mem
> should still keep memory as preserved in case KHO later will be
> finalized right? I have tested that this patch works with kho
> self-test: preserve, finalize, abort, finalize again, and the pages
> are properly preserved.
>
> KHO Test and memblock do not need to ever unpreserve pages, as they
> preserve them once during boot.

Agreed. The behaviour of reserve_mem and test_kho should be fixed, patch
3 just exposes the problem.

So, for this patch

Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>

>
>> Now that there is no notifier, and thus no abort, the pages must be
>> unpreserved explicitly before returning.
>>
>> Similarly, for test_kho, kho_test_notifier() calls kho_preserve_folio()
>> and expects the abort to clean things up.
>>
>> Side note: test_kho also preserves folios from kho_test_save_data() and
>> doesn't clean them up on error, but that is a separate problem that this
>> series doesn't have to solve.
>>
>> I think patch 3/7 is the one that actually causes this problem since it
>
> I updated that patch with your suggested fix.

Thanks!

-- 
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav


  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-24 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-22  0:57 [PATCHv7 0/7] liveupdate: Rework KHO for in-kernel users Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-22  0:57 ` [PATCHv7 1/7] kho: allow to drive kho from within kernel Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-23  7:13   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-10-22  0:57 ` [PATCHv7 2/7] kho: make debugfs interface optional Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-22 10:31   ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-22  0:57 ` [PATCHv7 3/7] kho: drop notifiers Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-22 11:01   ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-24  6:16     ` Mike Rapoport
2025-10-24  9:39       ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-24 13:11     ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-24 15:50       ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-24 15:52         ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-24 16:15           ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-24 16:32             ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-22  0:57 ` [PATCHv7 4/7] kho: add interfaces to unpreserve folios and page ranges Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-22 11:10   ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-24 13:18     ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-23  7:17   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-10-22  0:57 ` [PATCHv7 5/7] kho: don't unpreserve memory during abort Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-22 11:15   ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-23  7:20     ` Mike Rapoport
2025-10-24 13:28       ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-24 15:27         ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-24 15:33           ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-24 15:48             ` Pratyush Yadav [this message]
2025-10-22  0:57 ` [PATCHv7 6/7] liveupdate: kho: move to kernel/liveupdate Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-22  0:57 ` [PATCHv7 7/7] liveupdate: kho: move kho debugfs directory to liveupdate Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-23  7:32   ` Mike Rapoport
2025-10-24 13:33     ` Pasha Tatashin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=mafs0sef8e1wd.fsf@kernel.org \
    --to=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox