From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59BADCCA470 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2025 12:10:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 876C08E000E; Tue, 7 Oct 2025 08:10:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 84DED8E0005; Tue, 7 Oct 2025 08:10:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 78AD88E000E; Tue, 7 Oct 2025 08:10:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0015.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.15]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E638E0005 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2025 08:10:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin09.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D458498F for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2025 12:10:11 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 83971200264.09.6FA2D0B Received: from sea.source.kernel.org (sea.source.kernel.org [172.234.252.31]) by imf23.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DACD14000A for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2025 12:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf23.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=LD9oTq4j; spf=pass (imf23.hostedemail.com: domain of pratyush@kernel.org designates 172.234.252.31 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pratyush@kernel.org; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=kernel.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1759839010; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=N3kOZ6ZGIEmpHggLPNudEijuGEXi2mhTggJkYmbKlg0=; b=Hva/WIDBq5kS/Xp96bjWcK+ZzcP1K3l+OqgU71ZiuIOHsTr5tcFD3hPXiZKER1T8QWyBeF 48m+OW7YcGCYsxHzvQ4PYK9bsC88bUguMH8MBl67ZSP+iddlDMmxGwaKUIecJK4gi1IXus wS5Ats+UNWIQ60fHdH+2Z4z0i7hJoMs= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf23.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=LD9oTq4j; spf=pass (imf23.hostedemail.com: domain of pratyush@kernel.org designates 172.234.252.31 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pratyush@kernel.org; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=kernel.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1759839010; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=vrjrLLziRz7xtlpTUec7oqLq9Zhe7xTk5xeei8UEPW86LfonsMcLOwVCN2/VXRdFjct0OQ y/eOypFG3EznsxshQH30Q6+jWqpg96ZLs0uJ9ETj5z6sobwPYyof7W89p4CnaXUSe/oZhc 27sdUUu8FWuBoB6/PvAWkIPk7rGvJrM= Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C91443DC; Tue, 7 Oct 2025 12:10:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2FBADC4CEF1; Tue, 7 Oct 2025 12:09:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1759839008; bh=N6Czb2+ZTAi8kRLBoW7s3ZRCalj0NwNMB9s+8L5BhWg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=LD9oTq4jq08CjZmVNJWgEnuAZwVCZdv8sfwkIEAh/c+Oe5kq8WPOa5ZPTqlZfQB1Y CzDX/Z7o44Wj8DXBVHBYcbqxShGD991305RNKl9tWQjsBR9vCMG0D0Jpu0JZgXock7 M5TpqpIefyey4KfjdjXqQVvtUTKqxuF018Nec1Xegu5HV6SkxCOc34z/TWxWsHGFrl ire6hI4YY9Ko51XhW8NG3YXirlw0Ij4LdPq2q0ry2dv2pYYxPeXmLtd2sgWiBaiGT/ v2MFPjwtTslmDq8xIix4nsIVroVpF5lL/UYQu/0PaqsgEUR9Uzu6tf6whF285JRFM7 h3OqwGMuIFkwA== From: Pratyush Yadav To: Pasha Tatashin Cc: Pratyush Yadav , jasonmiu@google.com, graf@amazon.com, changyuanl@google.com, rppt@kernel.org, dmatlack@google.com, rientjes@google.com, corbet@lwn.net, rdunlap@infradead.org, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, kanie@linux.alibaba.com, ojeda@kernel.org, aliceryhl@google.com, masahiroy@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, tj@kernel.org, yoann.congal@smile.fr, mmaurer@google.com, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, chenridong@huawei.com, axboe@kernel.dk, mark.rutland@arm.com, jannh@google.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, david@redhat.com, joel.granados@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, anna.schumaker@oracle.com, song@kernel.org, zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn, linux@weissschuh.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, rafael@kernel.org, dakr@kernel.org, bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org, cw00.choi@samsung.com, myungjoo.ham@samsung.com, yesanishhere@gmail.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com, aleksander.lobakin@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, leon@kernel.org, lukas@wunner.de, bhelgaas@google.com, wagi@kernel.org, djeffery@redhat.com, stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com, lennart@poettering.net, brauner@kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, saeedm@nvidia.com, ajayachandra@nvidia.com, jgg@nvidia.com, parav@nvidia.com, leonro@nvidia.com, witu@nvidia.com, hughd@google.com, skhawaja@google.com, chrisl@kernel.org, steven.sistare@oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/30] kho: drop notifiers In-Reply-To: (Pasha Tatashin's message of "Mon, 6 Oct 2025 13:21:20 -0400") References: <20250929010321.3462457-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> <20250929010321.3462457-4-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2025 14:09:57 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 2DACD14000A X-Rspamd-Server: rspam11 X-Rspam-User: X-Stat-Signature: odpjpaqw1hnwicaysyex3hufbynuuzm4 X-HE-Tag: 1759839009-247693 X-HE-Meta: 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 spl+kOv/ 0CtWPoiIFPh/fgf5YHqf4vh/maGRVoPH1JnXj9n/4sVcc1JaAYUHX6u+gLmROCXWk6qKNgJE97W7emoRO2BzS7oQsOKBBCW8zQ+MpOEcWJkmMlF6vowqm3vU+jcnDR0H1LoMUVu7x+7iHDfQezTv4CeBotKxR2br6g4QELR42uWp6wQSykiwggvCvVujYsc/TXBvGR2nEw4xcfiHqZWNTztamAC/Dfunma84yi0U9k8TX9G4S9HE1SXhHXhfrKe74HKkVPHq0KGmAD9go3m22t+GVL46ngL4AarPSVZ0/YGx8GoDFE7VUZ4Ijy/6UZASYdoJK8iqGHsG4/ZjMTgVO9/e3uThmQwMT+vkZg1RsNEVSkL9YQxJJ9EMR2w== X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Mon, Oct 06 2025, Pasha Tatashin wrote: > On Mon, Oct 6, 2025 at 1:01=E2=80=AFPM Pratyush Yadav wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 29 2025, Pasha Tatashin wrote: >> >> > From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" >> > >> > The KHO framework uses a notifier chain as the mechanism for clients to >> > participate in the finalization process. While this works for a single, >> > central state machine, it is too restrictive for kernel-internal >> > components like pstore/reserve_mem or IMA. These components need a >> > simpler, direct way to register their state for preservation (e.g., >> > during their initcall) without being part of a complex, >> > shutdown-time notifier sequence. The notifier model forces all >> > participants into a single finalization flow and makes direct >> > preservation from an arbitrary context difficult. >> > This patch refactors the client participation model by removing the >> > notifier chain and introducing a direct API for managing FDT subtrees. >> > >> > The core kho_finalize() and kho_abort() state machine remains, but >> > clients now register their data with KHO beforehand. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) >> > Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin >> [...] >> > diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c >> > index e23e16618e9b..c4b2d4e4c715 100644 >> > --- a/mm/memblock.c >> > +++ b/mm/memblock.c >> > @@ -2444,53 +2444,18 @@ int reserve_mem_release_by_name(const char *na= me) >> > #define MEMBLOCK_KHO_FDT "memblock" >> > #define MEMBLOCK_KHO_NODE_COMPATIBLE "memblock-v1" >> > #define RESERVE_MEM_KHO_NODE_COMPATIBLE "reserve-mem-v1" >> > -static struct page *kho_fdt; >> > - >> > -static int reserve_mem_kho_finalize(struct kho_serialization *ser) >> > -{ >> > - int err =3D 0, i; >> > - >> > - for (i =3D 0; i < reserved_mem_count; i++) { >> > - struct reserve_mem_table *map =3D &reserved_mem_table[i]; >> > - struct page *page =3D phys_to_page(map->start); >> > - unsigned int nr_pages =3D map->size >> PAGE_SHIFT; >> > - >> > - err |=3D kho_preserve_pages(page, nr_pages); >> > - } >> > - >> > - err |=3D kho_preserve_folio(page_folio(kho_fdt)); >> > - err |=3D kho_add_subtree(ser, MEMBLOCK_KHO_FDT, page_to_virt(kho= _fdt)); >> > - >> > - return notifier_from_errno(err); >> > -} >> > - >> > -static int reserve_mem_kho_notifier(struct notifier_block *self, >> > - unsigned long cmd, void *v) >> > -{ >> > - switch (cmd) { >> > - case KEXEC_KHO_FINALIZE: >> > - return reserve_mem_kho_finalize((struct kho_serializatio= n *)v); >> > - case KEXEC_KHO_ABORT: >> > - return NOTIFY_DONE; >> > - default: >> > - return NOTIFY_BAD; >> > - } >> > -} >> > - >> > -static struct notifier_block reserve_mem_kho_nb =3D { >> > - .notifier_call =3D reserve_mem_kho_notifier, >> > -}; >> > >> > static int __init prepare_kho_fdt(void) >> > { >> > int err =3D 0, i; >> > + struct page *fdt_page; >> > void *fdt; >> > >> > - kho_fdt =3D alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL); >> > - if (!kho_fdt) >> > + fdt_page =3D alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL); >> > + if (!fdt_page) >> > return -ENOMEM; >> > >> > - fdt =3D page_to_virt(kho_fdt); >> > + fdt =3D page_to_virt(fdt_page); >> > >> > err |=3D fdt_create(fdt, PAGE_SIZE); >> > err |=3D fdt_finish_reservemap(fdt); >> > @@ -2499,7 +2464,10 @@ static int __init prepare_kho_fdt(void) >> > err |=3D fdt_property_string(fdt, "compatible", MEMBLOCK_KHO_NOD= E_COMPATIBLE); >> > for (i =3D 0; i < reserved_mem_count; i++) { >> > struct reserve_mem_table *map =3D &reserved_mem_table[i]; >> > + struct page *page =3D phys_to_page(map->start); >> > + unsigned int nr_pages =3D map->size >> PAGE_SHIFT; >> > >> > + err |=3D kho_preserve_pages(page, nr_pages); >> > err |=3D fdt_begin_node(fdt, map->name); >> > err |=3D fdt_property_string(fdt, "compatible", RESERVE_= MEM_KHO_NODE_COMPATIBLE); >> > err |=3D fdt_property(fdt, "start", &map->start, sizeof(= map->start)); >> > @@ -2507,13 +2475,14 @@ static int __init prepare_kho_fdt(void) >> > err |=3D fdt_end_node(fdt); >> > } >> > err |=3D fdt_end_node(fdt); >> > - >> > err |=3D fdt_finish(fdt); >> > >> > + err |=3D kho_preserve_folio(page_folio(fdt_page)); >> > + err |=3D kho_add_subtree(MEMBLOCK_KHO_FDT, fdt); >> > + >> > if (err) { >> > pr_err("failed to prepare memblock FDT for KHO: %d\n", e= rr); >> > - put_page(kho_fdt); >> > - kho_fdt =3D NULL; >> > + put_page(fdt_page); >> >> This adds subtree to KHO even if the FDT might be invalid. And then >> leaves a dangling reference in KHO to the FDT in case of an error. I >> think you should either do this check after >> kho_preserve_folio(page_folio(fdt_page)) and do a clean error check for >> kho_add_subtree(), or call kho_remove_subtree() in the error block. > > I agree, I do not like these err |=3D stuff, we should be checking > errors cleanly, and do proper clean-ups. Yeah, this is mainly a byproduct of using FDTs. Getting and setting simple properties also needs error checking and that can get tedious real quick. Which is why this pattern has shown up I suppose. > >> I prefer the former since if kho_add_subtree() is the one that fails, >> there is little sense in removing a subtree that was never added. >> >> > } >> > >> > return err; >> > @@ -2529,13 +2498,6 @@ static int __init reserve_mem_init(void) >> > err =3D prepare_kho_fdt(); >> > if (err) >> > return err; >> > - >> > - err =3D register_kho_notifier(&reserve_mem_kho_nb); >> > - if (err) { >> > - put_page(kho_fdt); >> > - kho_fdt =3D NULL; >> > - } >> > - >> > return err; >> > } >> > late_initcall(reserve_mem_init); >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Pratyush Yadav --=20 Regards, Pratyush Yadav