From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
Changyuan Lyu <changyuanl@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Michal Clapinski <mclapinski@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kho: initialize tail pages for higher order folios properly
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 15:38:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mafs0msaeo0tb.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+CK2bBoMfJuUCV6sL80kwzYPnENnt7fDk2jRMPV0iPn1jCJdw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 11 2025, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 9:06 AM Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 10 2025, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
[...]
>> >> > > We could, but with that would mean we'll run this before SMP and it's not
>> >> > > desirable. Also, init_deferred_page() for a random page requires
>> >> >
>> >> > We already run KHO init before smp_init:
>> >> > start_kernel() -> mm_core_init() -> kho_memory_init() ->
>> >> > kho_restore_folio() -> struct pages must be already initialized here!
>> >> >
>> >> > While deferred struct pages are initialized:
>> >> > start_kernel() -> rest_init() -> kernel_init() ->
>> >> > kernel_init_freeable() -> page_alloc_init_late() ->
>> >> > deferred_init_memmap()
>> >> >
>> >> > If the number of preserved pages that is needed during early boot is
>> >> > relatively small, that it should not be an issue to pre-initialize
>> >> > struct pages for them before deferred struct pages are initialized. We
>> >> > already pre-initialize some "struct pages" that are needed during
>> >> > early boot before the reset are initialized, see deferred_grow_zone()
>> >>
>> >> deferred_grow_zone() takes a chunk in the beginning of uninitialized range,
>> >> with kho we are talking about some random pages. If we preinit them early,
>> >> deferred_init_memmap() will overwrite them.
>> >
>> > Yes, this is why I am saying that we would need to skip the KHO
>> > initialized "struct pages" somehow during deferred initialization. If
>> > we create an ordered by PFN list of early-initialized KHO struct
>> > pages, skipping during deferred initialization could be done
>> > efficiently.
>>
>> Or keep things simple and don't use any KHO struct pages during early
>> init. You can access the page itself, just don't use its struct page.
>>
>> Currently the only user of kho_restore_folio() during init is
>> kho_memory_init(). The FDT is accessed by doing
>> phys_to_virt(kho_in.fdt_phys) anyway, so there is really no need for
>> restoring the folio so early. It can be done later, for example when LUO
>> does the finish event, to clean up and free the folio.
>
> Good suggestion, however, KHO does not have any sophisticated users
> that we are going to be adding as part of the live update work in the
> future: IR, KVM, early VCPU threads, and so on. So, while today, this
> might work, in the future, I am not sure if we should expect struct
> pages are not accessed until after deferred initialization or simply
> fix it once and for all.
Right. We might end up needing it down the line. But from a quick look,
it doesn't seem to be trivial to solve, so IMO we should solve it when
those use cases actually show up, and keep things simple for now.
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-11 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-05 17:11 Pratyush Yadav
2025-06-05 20:13 ` Andrew Morton
2025-06-06 8:04 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-06-06 16:23 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-06-09 19:36 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-06-09 20:07 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-06-10 5:44 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-06-10 11:20 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-06-10 16:41 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-06-10 22:33 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-06-11 13:06 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-06-11 13:14 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-06-11 13:35 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-06-11 14:01 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-06-11 14:36 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-06-13 14:22 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-06-13 16:21 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-06-11 13:38 ` Pratyush Yadav [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mafs0msaeo0tb.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=changyuanl@google.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mclapinski@google.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox