From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
To: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@gmail.com>
Cc: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Changyuan Lyu <changyuanl@google.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
anthony.yznaga@oracle.com, arnd@arndb.de, ashish.kalra@amd.com,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, bp@alien8.de,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, corbet@lwn.net,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
dwmw2@infradead.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, graf@amazon.com,
hpa@zytor.com, jgowans@amazon.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
krzk@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, luto@kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, mingo@redhat.com,
pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, robh@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
saravanak@google.com, skinsburskii@linux.microsoft.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, will@kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
thevlad@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 12/17] x86/e820: temporarily enable KHO scratch for memory below 1M
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 15:39:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mafs0ikeyw509.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <80622f99-0ef4-491b-87f6-c9790dfecef6@gmail.com> (Usama Arif's message of "Tue, 25 Nov 2025 14:31:54 +0000")
On Tue, Nov 25 2025, Usama Arif wrote:
> On 25/11/2025 13:15, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 24 2025, Usama Arif wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/05/2025 08:46, Changyuan Lyu wrote:
>>>> From: Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>
>>>>
>>>> KHO kernels are special and use only scratch memory for memblock
>>>> allocations, but memory below 1M is ignored by kernel after early boot
>>>> and cannot be naturally marked as scratch.
>>>>
>>>> To allow allocation of the real-mode trampoline and a few (if any) other
>>>> very early allocations from below 1M forcibly mark the memory below 1M
>>>> as scratch.
>>>>
>>>> After real mode trampoline is allocated, clear that scratch marking.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>
[...]
>> Anyway, you do indeed point at a bug. memblock_mark_kho_scratch() should
>> only be called on a KHO boot, not unconditionally. So even with
>> CONFIG_MEMBLOCK_KHO_SCRATCH enabled, this should only be called on a KHO
>> boot, not every time.
>>
>> I think the below diff should fix the warning for you by making sure the
>> scratch areas are not present on non-KHO boot. I still don't know why
>> you hit the warning in the first place though. If you'd be willing to
>> dig deeper into that, it would be great.
>>
>> Can you give the below a try and if it fixes the problem for you I can
>> send it on the list.
>
> Is there a reason for compiling this code with is_kho_boot, when we have disabled
> KEXEC_HANDOVER and dont want this in? i.e. why not just ifdef it with MEMBLOCK_KHO_SCRATCH
> when that defconfig is designed for it?
is_kho_boot() will always be false when CONFIG_KEXEC_HANDOVER is not
enabled. So the compiler should optimize this out.
Only using the ifdef is not enough. Just because the config is enabled
doesn't mean every boot will be a KHO boot. You can do regular reboots
or even regular kexec, without ever having KHO involved. We only want to
call this for a KHO boot. So a runtime check is needed anyway.
>
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
>> index c3acbd26408ba..0a34dc011bf91 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>> #include <linux/firmware-map.h>
>> #include <linux/sort.h>
>> #include <linux/memory_hotplug.h>
>> +#include <linux/kexec_handover.h>
>>
>> #include <asm/e820/api.h>
>> #include <asm/setup.h>
>> @@ -1315,7 +1316,8 @@ void __init e820__memblock_setup(void)
>> * After real mode trampoline is allocated, we clear that scratch
>> * marking.
>> */
>> - memblock_mark_kho_scratch(0, SZ_1M);
>> + if (is_kho_boot())
>> + memblock_mark_kho_scratch(0, SZ_1M);
>>
>> /*
>> * 32-bit systems are limited to 4BG of memory even with HIGHMEM and
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/realmode/init.c b/arch/x86/realmode/init.c
>> index 88be32026768c..4e9b4dff17216 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/realmode/init.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/realmode/init.c
>> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>> #include <linux/memblock.h>
>> #include <linux/cc_platform.h>
>> #include <linux/pgtable.h>
>> +#include <linux/kexec_handover.h>
>>
>> #include <asm/set_memory.h>
>> #include <asm/realmode.h>
>> @@ -67,7 +68,8 @@ void __init reserve_real_mode(void)
>> */
>> memblock_reserve(0, SZ_1M);
>>
>> - memblock_clear_kho_scratch(0, SZ_1M);
>> + if (is_kho_boot())
>> + memblock_clear_kho_scratch(0, SZ_1M);
>> }
>>
>> static void __init sme_sev_setup_real_mode(struct trampoline_header *th)
>>
>>
>
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-25 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-09 7:46 [PATCH v8 00/17] kexec: introduce Kexec HandOver (KHO) Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 01/17] memblock: add MEMBLOCK_RSRV_KERN flag Changyuan Lyu
2025-10-10 9:33 ` Breno Leitao
2025-10-13 14:59 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-13 16:40 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-10-14 8:34 ` Breno Leitao
2025-10-14 13:10 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-05 10:18 ` Breno Leitao
2025-11-06 8:24 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 02/17] memblock: Add support for scratch memory Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 03/17] memblock: introduce memmap_init_kho_scratch() Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 04/17] kexec: add Kexec HandOver (KHO) generation helpers Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 05/17] kexec: add KHO parsing support Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 06/17] kexec: enable KHO support for memory preservation Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 07/17] kexec: add KHO support to kexec file loads Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 08/17] kexec: add config option for KHO Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 09/17] arm64: add KHO support Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 10/17] x86/setup: use memblock_reserve_kern for memory used by kernel Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 11/17] x86/kexec: add support for passing kexec handover (KHO) data Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 12/17] x86/e820: temporarily enable KHO scratch for memory below 1M Changyuan Lyu
2025-11-24 19:24 ` Usama Arif
2025-11-25 0:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-25 12:23 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-25 13:53 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-25 13:15 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-25 13:50 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-25 18:47 ` Usama Arif
2025-11-26 6:14 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-26 7:25 ` Usama Arif
2025-11-25 14:31 ` Usama Arif
2025-11-25 14:39 ` Pratyush Yadav [this message]
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 13/17] x86/boot: make sure KASLR does not step over KHO preserved memory Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 14/17] x86/Kconfig: enable kexec handover for 64 bits Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 15/17] memblock: add KHO support for reserve_mem Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 16/17] Documentation: add documentation for KHO Changyuan Lyu
2025-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v8 17/17] Documentation: KHO: Add memblock bindings Changyuan Lyu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mafs0ikeyw509.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anthony.yznaga@oracle.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=changyuanl@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgowans@amazon.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=skinsburskii@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thevlad@meta.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox