From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx131.postini.com [74.125.245.131]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 101D26B0038 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 12:06:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [Bug fix PATCH v2] numa, cpu hotplug: Change links of CPU and node when changing node number by onlining CPU References: <5170D4CB.20900@jp.fujitsu.com> <20130422153541.04ba682f13910cfede0d2ff7@linux-foundation.org> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:06:55 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20130422153541.04ba682f13910cfede0d2ff7@linux-foundation.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:35:41 -0700") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu , kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com, mingo@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Andrew Morton writes: > > Would it not be better to fix this by assigning those CPUs to their real, > memoryless node right at the initial boot? Or is there something in > the kernel which makes cpus-on-a-memoryless-node not work correctly? I probably added this originally. The original reason was that long ago the VM was broken with memory less nodes. These days it is likely obsolete. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org