From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Subject: Re: linux 2.4.0test1ac8+riels patch performs okay
References: <393C06BE.E335574@student.kuleuven.ac.be>
From: "John Fremlin" <vii@penguinpowered.com>
Date: 05 Jun 2000 21:18:00 +0100
In-Reply-To: Frank Dekervel's message of "Mon, 05 Jun 2000 21:59:59 +0200"
Message-ID: <m2wvk3evbb.fsf@boreas.southchinaseas>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
Return-Path: <owner-linux-mm@kvack.org>
To: Frank Dekervel <frank.dekervel@student.kuleuven.ac.be>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
List-ID: <linux-mm.kvack.org>

Frank Dekervel <frank.dekervel@student.kuleuven.ac.be> writes:
> -> it is much more responsive than any other development kernels i have
> tested. offcourse this may be a bit subjective.

My patch (vs ac7+Rik3) improves responsiveness with several running
processes considerably (at least on my system). Could you test it?
(I posted it to linux-mm and linux-kernel on Sunday).

-- 

	http://altern.org/vii
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/