From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx182.postini.com [74.125.245.182]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4514C6B0072 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:58:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/31] mm/mpol: Remove NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT References: <20121025121617.617683848@chello.nl> <20121025124833.247790041@chello.nl> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:58:48 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20121025124833.247790041@chello.nl> (Peter Zijlstra's message of "Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:16:27 +0200") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Rik van Riel , Andrea Arcangeli , Mel Gorman , Johannes Weiner , Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Lee Schermerhorn , Ingo Molnar Peter Zijlstra writes: > Since the NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT statistic is useless on its own; it wants > to be compared to either a total of interleave allocations or to a miss > count, remove it. NACK, as already posted several times. This breaks the numactl test suite, which is the only way currently to test interleaving. Please don't ignore review feedback. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org