From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx165.postini.com [74.125.245.165]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C69B6B004A for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:19:13 -0500 (EST) From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/22] mm: lru_lock splitting References: <20120220171138.22196.65847.stgit@zurg> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:19:19 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20120220171138.22196.65847.stgit@zurg> (Konstantin Khlebnikov's message of "Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:22:35 +0400") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Konstantin Khlebnikov Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Konstantin Khlebnikov writes: Konstantin, > There complete patch-set with my lru_lock splitting > plus all related preparations and cleanups rebased to next-20120210 On large systems we're also seeing lock contention on the lru_lock without using memcgs. Any thoughts how this could be extended for this situation too? Thanks, -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org