From: ebiederm+eric@npwt.net (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@dcs.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: Hans Reiser <reiser@ricochet.net>,
Shawn Leas <sleas@ixion.honeywell.com>,
Reiserfs <reiserfs@devlinux.com>,
Ken Tetrick <ktetrick@ixion.honeywell.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: (reiserfs) Re: More on Re: (reiserfs) Reiserfs and ext2fs (was Re: (reiserfs) Sum Benchmarks (these look typical?))
Date: 29 Jun 1998 14:59:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1u354dlna.fsf@flinx.npwt.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: "Stephen C. Tweedie"'s message of Mon, 29 Jun 1998 11:35:15 +0100
>>>>> "ST" == Stephen C Tweedie <sct@dcs.ed.ac.uk> writes:
ST> Hi,
ST> In article <m1emwcf97d.fsf@flinx.npwt.net>, ebiederm+eric@npwt.net (Eric
ST> W. Biederman) writes:
>> Unless I have missed something write-back from the page cache is
>> important, because then when you delete a file you haven't written yet
>> you can completely avoid I/O. For short lived files this should be a
>> performance win.
ST> We already do bforget() to deal with this in the buffer cache. Having
ST> the outstanding IO labelled in the buffer cache will not result in
ST> redundant writes in this case.
That's good to know. It doesn't suprise me but I hadn't been through the
code enough to see that one. I knew about bforget I just hadn't seen
it used.
>>>> This functionality is essentially what is implemented with brw_page,
>>>> and I have written the generic_page_write that does essentially
>>>> this. There is no data copying however. The fun angle is mapped
>>>> pages need to be unmapped (or at least read only mapped) for a write
>>>> to be successful.
ST> Indeed; however, it might be a reasonable compromise to do a copy out
ST> from the page cache to the buffer cache in this situation (we already
ST> have a copy in there, so this would not hurt performance relative to
ST> the current system).
>> Agreed. But it takes more work to write.
ST> On reflection, it's not an issue. Mapped pages do not have to be
ST> unmapped at all. We can continue to share between cache and buffers as
ST> long as we want. Later modifications to the data in the cache page will
ST> update the buffer contents, true, but that's irrelevant as we will still
ST> be writing valid file contents to disk when the IO arrives. Those
ST> semantics are just fine.
There are two problems I see.
1) A DMA controller actively access the same memory the CPU is
accessing could be a problem. Recall video flicker on old video
cards.
2) More importantly the cpu writes to the _cache_, and the DMA
controller reads from the RAM. I don't see any consistency garnatees
there. We may be able solve these problems on a per architecture or
device basis however.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-06-29 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.HPP.3.96.980617035608.29950A-100000@ixion.honeywell.com>
[not found] ` <199806221138.MAA00852@dax.dcs.ed.ac.uk>
[not found] ` <358F4FBE.821B333C@ricochet.net>
[not found] ` <m11zsgrvnf.fsf@flinx.npwt.net>
[not found] ` <199806241154.MAA03544@dax.dcs.ed.ac.uk>
[not found] ` <m11zse6ecw.fsf@flinx.npwt.net>
1998-06-25 11:00 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1998-06-26 15:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
1998-06-29 10:35 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1998-06-29 19:59 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
1998-06-30 16:10 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1998-07-01 0:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
1998-07-01 9:12 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1998-07-01 12:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
1998-07-01 13:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
1998-07-01 20:07 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1998-07-02 15:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1u354dlna.fsf@flinx.npwt.net \
--to=ebiederm+eric@npwt.net \
--cc=ktetrick@ixion.honeywell.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=reiser@ricochet.net \
--cc=reiserfs@devlinux.com \
--cc=sct@dcs.ed.ac.uk \
--cc=sleas@ixion.honeywell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox