From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [PATCH] rd: Mark ramdisk buffers heads dirty References: <200710151028.34407.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <200710171814.01717.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <200710172348.23113.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:22:13 -0600 In-Reply-To: <200710172348.23113.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> (Christian Borntraeger's message of "Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:48:23 +0200") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christian Borntraeger Cc: Andrew Morton , Nick Piggin , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Martin Schwidefsky , Theodore Ts'o , stable@kernel.org List-ID: Christian Borntraeger writes: > Am Mittwoch, 17. Oktober 2007 schrieb Eric W. Biederman: >> Did you have both of my changes applied? >> To init_page_buffer() and to the ramdisk_set_dirty_page? > > Yes, I removed my patch and applied both patches from you. Thanks. Grr. Inconsistent rules on a core piece of infrastructure. It looks like that if there is any trivial/minimal fix it is based on your patch suppressing try_to_free_buffers. Ugh. Eric -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org