From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
dmccr@us.ibm.com,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>,
Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
mingo@redhat.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>,
manfred@colorfullife.com, wli@holomorphy.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Page table sharing
Date: 18 Feb 2002 21:27:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1heoe3xls.fsf@frodo.biederman.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E16cy8E-0000xp-00@starship.berlin>
Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net> writes:
> On February 19, 2002 01:03 am, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > On February 18, 2002 08:04 pm, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > > > On February 18, 2002 09:09 am, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > > > > Since copy_page_range would not copy shared page tables, I'm wrong to
> > > > > > point there. But __pte_alloc does copy shared page tables (to unshare
>
> > > > > > them), and needs them to be stable while it does so: so locking
> against
>
> > > > > > swap_out really is required. It also needs locking against read
> faults,
>
> > > > > > and they against each other: but there I imagine it's just a matter of
>
> > > > > > dropping the write arg to __pte_alloc, going back to pte_alloc again.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure what you mean here, you're not suggesting we should unshare the
>
> > > page table on read fault are you?
> >
> > I am. But I can understand that you'd prefer not to do it that way.
> > Hugh
>
> No, that's not nearly studly enough ;-)
>
> Since we have gone to all the trouble of sharing the page table, we should
> swap in/out for all sharers at the same time. That is, keep it shared, saving
> memory and cpu.
>
> Now I finally see what you were driving at: before, we could count on the
> mm->page_table_lock for exclusion on read fault, now we can't, at least not
> when ptb->count is great than one[1]. So let's come up with something nice as
> a substitute, any suggestions?
>
> [1] I think that's a big, broad hint.
Something like:
struct mm_share {
spinlock_t page_table_lock;
struct list_head mm_list;
};
struct mm {
struct list_head mm_list;
struct mm_share *mm_share;
.....
};
So we have an overarching structure for all of the shared mm's.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-19 4:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0202162219230.8326-100000@home.transmeta.com>
2002-02-17 19:39 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-17 20:16 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-17 22:16 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-02-18 1:35 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-18 8:09 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-02-18 9:41 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-18 11:32 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-18 19:04 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-02-18 23:37 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-19 0:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-02-19 1:22 ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-19 1:29 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-19 1:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-02-19 1:53 ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-19 2:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-02-19 2:22 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-19 2:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-02-19 2:55 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-19 3:11 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-19 3:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-02-19 3:45 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-19 17:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-02-19 18:11 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-02-20 14:18 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-20 15:30 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-02-20 14:10 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-20 14:38 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-02-20 14:57 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-19 11:39 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-19 12:22 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-02-19 12:43 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-19 10:02 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-22 5:29 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-22 6:32 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-22 9:21 ` [RFC] Page table sharing, leak gone Daniel Phillips
2002-02-19 1:57 ` [RFC] Page table sharing Daniel Phillips
2002-02-19 1:23 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-19 1:50 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-19 1:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-02-19 2:12 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-18 23:48 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-18 23:59 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-19 0:03 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-02-19 0:27 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-19 4:27 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2002-02-19 17:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-02-19 18:18 Qing Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1heoe3xls.fsf@frodo.biederman.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=dmccr@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox