* glibc and kernel update
@ 1998-06-25 13:58 Rik van Riel
1998-06-25 15:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
1998-06-25 16:34 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Rik van Riel @ 1998-06-25 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux MM
Hi,
I still haven't resolved the problems between glibc, the
2.1 kernel series and pppd :(
Now I got a new idea: Since most of the kernel interfaces
go through glibc, does this mean that I have to get the
glibc source and recompile the whole thing in order to get
working ppp with a 2.1 kernel?
Rik.
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Linux memory management tour guide. H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl |
| Scouting Vries cubscout leader. http://www.phys.uu.nl/~riel/ |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: glibc and kernel update
1998-06-25 13:58 glibc and kernel update Rik van Riel
@ 1998-06-25 15:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
1998-06-25 21:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
1998-06-26 4:34 ` Rik van Riel
1998-06-25 16:34 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Eric W. Biederman @ 1998-06-25 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rik van Riel; +Cc: Linux MM
>>>>> "RR" == Rik van Riel <H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl> writes:
RR> Hi,
RR> I still haven't resolved the problems between glibc, the
RR> 2.1 kernel series and pppd :(
RR> Now I got a new idea: Since most of the kernel interfaces
RR> go through glibc, does this mean that I have to get the
RR> glibc source and recompile the whole thing in order to get
RR> working ppp with a 2.1 kernel?
Just what problem are you having?
I just got 2.3.5 to compile with glibc, but I haven't had a chance to
test it yet..
Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: glibc and kernel update
1998-06-25 15:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
@ 1998-06-25 21:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
1998-06-26 4:34 ` Rik van Riel
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Eric W. Biederman @ 1998-06-25 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rik van Riel; +Cc: Linux MM
>>>>> "EB" == Eric W Biederman <ebiederm> writes:
>>>>> "RR" == Rik van Riel <H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl> writes:
RR> Hi,
RR> I still haven't resolved the problems between glibc, the
RR> 2.1 kernel series and pppd :(
EB> Just what problem are you having?
EB> I just got 2.3.5 to compile with glibc, but I haven't had a chance to
EB> test it yet..
Just tested it on 2.0 but compiled with 2.1.101 headers, and glibc.
I don't see any problems. Explain your problem or start writing code :)
Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: glibc and kernel update
1998-06-25 15:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
1998-06-25 21:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
@ 1998-06-26 4:34 ` Rik van Riel
1998-06-26 14:43 ` Eric W. Biederman
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Rik van Riel @ 1998-06-26 4:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric W. Biederman; +Cc: Linux MM
On 25 Jun 1998, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> RR> I still haven't resolved the problems between glibc, the
> RR> 2.1 kernel series and pppd :(
>
> RR> Now I got a new idea: Since most of the kernel interfaces
> RR> go through glibc, does this mean that I have to get the
> RR> glibc source and recompile the whole thing in order to get
> RR> working ppp with a 2.1 kernel?
>
> Just what problem are you having?
Pppd dies with "This kernel doesn't support PPP", while it
most certainly _does_. I traced it back to a socket operation
which isn't exported properly through glibc...
> I just got 2.3.5 to compile with glibc, but I haven't had a chance to
> test it yet..
It compiles perfectly. It just doesn't run ;(
Rik.
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Linux memory management tour guide. H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl |
| Scouting Vries cubscout leader. http://www.phys.uu.nl/~riel/ |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: glibc and kernel update
1998-06-26 4:34 ` Rik van Riel
@ 1998-06-26 14:43 ` Eric W. Biederman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Eric W. Biederman @ 1998-06-26 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rik van Riel; +Cc: Linux MM
>>>>> "RR" == Rik van Riel <H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl> writes:
RR> On 25 Jun 1998, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
RR> I still haven't resolved the problems between glibc, the
RR> 2.1 kernel series and pppd :(
>>
RR> Now I got a new idea: Since most of the kernel interfaces
RR> go through glibc, does this mean that I have to get the
RR> glibc source and recompile the whole thing in order to get
RR> working ppp with a 2.1 kernel?
>>
>> Just what problem are you having?
RR> Pppd dies with "This kernel doesn't support PPP", while it
RR> most certainly _does_. I traced it back to a socket operation
RR> which isn't exported properly through glibc...
>> I just got 2.3.5 to compile with glibc, but I haven't had a chance to
>> test it yet..
RR> It compiles perfectly. It just doesn't run ;(
I just did a second test.
pppd-2.3.5 with glibc-2.0.6 on kernel-2.1.101 (with a few patches)
pppd works here.
The only thing I can imagine is do your /usr/include/linux & /usr/include/asm
point to ``safe'' kernel headers or the real thing. Mine point to the real thing.
Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: glibc and kernel update
1998-06-25 13:58 glibc and kernel update Rik van Riel
1998-06-25 15:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
@ 1998-06-25 16:34 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1998-06-26 4:32 ` Rik van Riel
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephen C. Tweedie @ 1998-06-25 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rik van Riel; +Cc: Linux MM
Hi,
On Thu, 25 Jun 1998 15:58:12 +0200 (CEST), Rik van Riel
<H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl> said:
> Hi,
> I still haven't resolved the problems between glibc, the
> 2.1 kernel series and pppd :(
What problems?
--Stephen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: glibc and kernel update
1998-06-25 16:34 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
@ 1998-06-26 4:32 ` Rik van Riel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Rik van Riel @ 1998-06-26 4:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen C. Tweedie; +Cc: Rik van Riel, Linux MM
On Thu, 25 Jun 1998, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jun 1998 15:58:12 +0200 (CEST), Rik van Riel
> <H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl> said:
>
> > I still haven't resolved the problems between glibc, the
> > 2.1 kernel series and pppd :(
>
> What problems?
The glibc I have is compiled with a 2.0 kernel. I can
recompile pppd-2.3.5 as much as I like, but it refuses
to work with 2.1 kernels...
It says something like: "This kernel doesn't support ppp",
while that exact same kernel works perfectly with libc5
and the same pppd version :(
Rik.
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Linux memory management tour guide. H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl |
| Scouting Vries cubscout leader. http://www.phys.uu.nl/~riel/ |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1998-06-26 14:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1998-06-25 13:58 glibc and kernel update Rik van Riel
1998-06-25 15:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
1998-06-25 21:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
1998-06-26 4:34 ` Rik van Riel
1998-06-26 14:43 ` Eric W. Biederman
1998-06-25 16:34 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1998-06-26 4:32 ` Rik van Riel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox