From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from flinx.npwt.net (eric@flinx.npwt.net [208.236.161.237])
	by kvack.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA27400
	for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 1998 13:33:21 -0400
Subject: Re: glibc and kernel update
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980625155639.31988C-100000@mirkwood.dummy.home>
From: ebiederm+eric@npwt.net (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: 25 Jun 1998 10:46:32 -0500
In-Reply-To: Rik van Riel's message of Thu, 25 Jun 1998 15:58:12 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <m1g1gt4h7r.fsf@flinx.npwt.net>
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
To: Rik van Riel <H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl>
Cc: Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
List-ID: <linux-mm.kvack.org>

>>>>> "RR" == Rik van Riel <H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl> writes:

RR> Hi,
RR> I still haven't resolved the problems between glibc, the
RR> 2.1 kernel series and pppd :(

RR> Now I got a new idea: Since most of the kernel interfaces
RR> go through glibc, does this mean that I have to get the
RR> glibc source and recompile the whole thing in order to get
RR> working ppp with a 2.1 kernel?

Just what problem are you having?

I just got 2.3.5 to compile with glibc, but I haven't had a chance to
test it yet..

Eric