linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederman@uswest.net (Eric W. Biederman)
To: riel@nl.linux.org
Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: pressuring dirty pages (2.3.99-pre6)
Date: 25 Apr 2000 08:58:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m166t6ffjc.fsf@flinx.biederman.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Rik van Riel's message of "Mon, 24 Apr 2000 19:42:12 -0300 (BRST)"

Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br> writes:

> On Mon, 24 Apr 2000, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 04:54:38PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > 
> > > I've been trying to fix the VM balance for a week or so now,
> > > and things are mostly fixed except for one situation.
> > > 
> > > If there is a *heavy* write going on and the data is in the
> > > page cache only .. ie. no buffer heads available, then the
> > > page cache will grow almost without bounds and kswapd and
> > > the rest of the system will basically spin in shrink_mmap()...
> > 
> > shrink_mmap is the problem then -- it should be giving up sooner
> > and letting try_to_swap_out() deal with the pages.  mmap()ed
> > dirty pages can only be freed through swapper activity, not via
> > shrink_mmap().
> 
> That will not work. The problem isn't that kswapd eats cpu,
> but the problem is that the dirty pages completely dominate
> physical memory.
> 
> I've tried the "giving up earlier" option in shrink_mmap(),
> but that leads to memory filling up just as badly and giving
> us the same kind of trouble.
> 
> I guess what we want is the kind of callback that we do in
> the direction of the buffer cache, using something like the
> bdflush wakeup call done in try_to_free_buffers() ...
> 
> Maybe a "special" return value from shrink_mmap() telling
> do_try_to_free_pages() to run swap_out() unconditionally
> after this succesful shrink_mmap() call?  Maybe even with
> severity levels?
> 
> Eg. more calls to swap_out() if we encountered a lot of
> dirty pages in shrink_mmap() ???

I suspect the simplest thing we could do would be to actually implement
a RSS limit per struct mm.  Roughly in handle_pte_fault if the page isn't
present and we are at our rss limit call swap_out_mm, until we are
below the limit.  

This won't hurt much in the uncontended case, because the page
cache will still keep everything anyway, some dirty pages
will just get buffer_heads, and bdflush might clean those pages.

In the contended case, it removes some of the burden from swap_out,
and it should give shrink_mmap some pages to work with...

How we can approach the ideal of dynamically managed max RSS
sizes is another question...

Eric
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2000-04-25 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-04-24 19:54 Rik van Riel
2000-04-24 21:27 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-04-24 22:42   ` Rik van Riel
2000-04-25  9:35     ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-04-25 15:25       ` Rik van Riel
2000-04-25 13:58     ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2000-04-25 14:27 Mark_H_Johnson.RTS
2000-04-25 16:30 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-04-25 19:14   ` Eric W. Biederman
2000-04-25 19:47     ` Rik van Riel
2000-04-26 11:43       ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2000-04-26 11:06     ` Stephen C. Tweedie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m166t6ffjc.fsf@flinx.biederman.org \
    --to=ebiederman@uswest.net \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@nl.linux.org \
    --cc=sct@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox