From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by fenrus.demon.nl via sendmail from stdin id (Debian Smail3.2.0.102) for linux-mm@kvack.org; Fri, 12 May 2000 15:21:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 15:21:22 +0200 (CEST) From: arjan@fenrus.demon.nl (Arjan van de Ven) Subject: Re: PATCH: rewrite of invalidate_inode_pages In-Reply-To: <14619.16278.813629.967654@charged.uio.no> <391BEAED.C9313263@sympatico.ca> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Trond Myklebust Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: In article you wrote: >>>>>> " " == Juan J Quintela writes: > > This was a first approach patch, if people like the thing > > configurable, I can try to do that the weekend. > Juan, Linus, > Could you please look into changing the name of > invalidate_inode_pages() to invalidate_pages_noblock() or something > like that? Since NFS is the only place where this function is used, a > change of name should not break any other code. I'd vote for "invalidate_unlocked_inode_pages", as it also suggests that the locked pages aren't invalidated. Greetings, Arjan van de Ven -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/