From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3D6EE9410A for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 04:49:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id C41FB6B0005; Mon, 29 Dec 2025 23:49:07 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id BEFC96B0089; Mon, 29 Dec 2025 23:49:07 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id AFB5C6B008A; Mon, 29 Dec 2025 23:49:07 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0015.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.15]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9E86B0005 for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2025 23:49:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin20.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA5716129F for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 04:49:07 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 84274907934.20.AC68B15 Received: from out-171.mta0.migadu.com (out-171.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.171]) by imf12.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3995040002 for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 04:49:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf12.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux.dev header.s=key1 header.b=ovyyabce; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass (imf12.hostedemail.com: domain of shakeel.butt@linux.dev designates 91.218.175.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=shakeel.butt@linux.dev ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1767070145; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=DHpxK+8d1GoPyLtItoR2TuMXvT9f0wqjw63jtpzrTLIsMzlUwP3tWc27yEjPUU+/ODdMjm eAcndRm0iNcsnP4pnWIBlfYV6WhiefJ9ZSDJsDdXFO+1nczoK/xzvsRVz+NZWwRk8zZCve 0TuIA7Kf3/g/rS+jUP0fx5l8HlWv+Hs= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf12.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux.dev header.s=key1 header.b=ovyyabce; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass (imf12.hostedemail.com: domain of shakeel.butt@linux.dev designates 91.218.175.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=shakeel.butt@linux.dev ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1767070145; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=8hZeno5oIt6J6Bc6V0PL7wUGOP1/2GdnYexT8Hupqww=; b=ivlAUK+84fruEMT7RhV/XYL8Dg1K7f1OohHR9v9ASnbqwnnNs91L4Dyxd0w4gs2L+m1NIU eWQWfihYkzJ32pTQXN/MYzMeqZVnps6hCM7d2RWNrr7WOnGfntieLZgoxcq+XHQORt7fQj D7enosOI2ppDXk8fwPOq5haoWL3CXIo= Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 20:48:54 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1767070142; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8hZeno5oIt6J6Bc6V0PL7wUGOP1/2GdnYexT8Hupqww=; b=ovyyabce7Jt1awm1nqzdjwTZoNxtEAY5Hh/oEZ2fpFEev2gAhRvJ0M0ONabqtbUzmNpSK1 8pTWncgHE2uOR0vE8y24K+SnHSgKcqd7g3oJB1m9ch4gsZmnVL8dXpMMAOKpn1Hdwud6WV aQpnfKqsLRgmiVJbXb8pXzwyyQ0I8qU= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Shakeel Butt To: Qi Zheng Cc: Roman Gushchin , hannes@cmpxchg.org, hughd@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, muchun.song@linux.dev, david@kernel.org, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, ziy@nvidia.com, harry.yoo@oracle.com, imran.f.khan@oracle.com, kamalesh.babulal@oracle.com, axelrasmussen@google.com, yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com, chenridong@huaweicloud.com, mkoutny@suse.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hamzamahfooz@linux.microsoft.com, apais@linux.microsoft.com, lance.yang@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Qi Zheng Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/28] Eliminate Dying Memory Cgroup Message-ID: References: <7ia4ldikrbsj.fsf@castle.c.googlers.com> <1fe35038-abe1-4103-b5de-81e2b422bd21@linux.dev> <87tsx861o5.fsf@linux.dev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 3995040002 X-Stat-Signature: x51zanmugamwcpragzhio7cwa798hbmm X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1767070144-876811 X-HE-Meta: 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 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Tue, Dec 30, 2025 at 12:25:31PM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote: > > [...] > > > > > > Thank you for running the AI review for this patchset, but please do not > > > directly send the raw data from the AI review to the community, as this > > > is no different from automated review by a robot. > > > > Hi Qi, > > > > I don't know why you're so negative towards it. It's been great at > > No, I don't object to having a dedicated robot to do this. > > > finding pretty tricky bugs often missed by human reviewers. In no way > > it's a replacement for human reviews, but if a robot can find real > > issues and make the kernel more reliable and safe, I'm in. > > I just think you should do a preliminary review of the AI ​​review results > instead of sending them out directly. Otherwise, if everyone does this, > the community will be full of bots. > > No? > We don't want too many bots but we definitely want at least one AI review bot. Now we have precedence of BPF and networking subsystem and the results I have seen are really good. I think the MM community needs to come together and decide on the formalities of AI review process and I see Roman is doing some early experimentation and result looks great. Shakeel