From: Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 08/20] slab: add optimized sheaf refill from partial list
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 14:27:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <kp7fvhxxjyyzk47n67m4xwzgm7gxoqmgglqdvzpkcxqb26sjc4@bu4lil75nc3c> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38de0039-e0ea-41c4-a293-400798390ea1@suse.cz>
On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 03:25:59PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 1/12/26 16:17, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > At this point we have sheaves enabled for all caches, but their refill
> > is done via __kmem_cache_alloc_bulk() which relies on cpu (partial)
> > slabs - now a redundant caching layer that we are about to remove.
> >
> > The refill will thus be done from slabs on the node partial list.
> > Introduce new functions that can do that in an optimized way as it's
> > easier than modifying the __kmem_cache_alloc_bulk() call chain.
> >
> > Extend struct partial_context so it can return a list of slabs from the
> > partial list with the sum of free objects in them within the requested
> > min and max.
> >
> > Introduce get_partial_node_bulk() that removes the slabs from freelist
> > and returns them in the list.
> >
> > Introduce get_freelist_nofreeze() which grabs the freelist without
> > freezing the slab.
> >
> > Introduce alloc_from_new_slab() which can allocate multiple objects from
> > a newly allocated slab where we don't need to synchronize with freeing.
> > In some aspects it's similar to alloc_single_from_new_slab() but assumes
> > the cache is a non-debug one so it can avoid some actions.
> >
> > Introduce __refill_objects() that uses the functions above to fill an
> > array of objects. It has to handle the possibility that the slabs will
> > contain more objects that were requested, due to concurrent freeing of
> > objects to those slabs. When no more slabs on partial lists are
> > available, it will allocate new slabs. It is intended to be only used
> > in context where spinning is allowed, so add a WARN_ON_ONCE check there.
> >
> > Finally, switch refill_sheaf() to use __refill_objects(). Sheaves are
> > only refilled from contexts that allow spinning, or even blocking.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
>
> ...
>
> > +static unsigned int alloc_from_new_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
> > + void **p, unsigned int count, bool allow_spin)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int allocated = 0;
> > + struct kmem_cache_node *n;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + void *object;
> > +
> > + if (!allow_spin && (slab->objects - slab->inuse) > count) {
> > +
> > + n = get_node(s, slab_nid(slab));
> > +
> > + if (!spin_trylock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags)) {
> > + /* Unlucky, discard newly allocated slab */
> > + defer_deactivate_slab(slab, NULL);
>
> This actually does dec_slabs_node() only with slab->frozen which we don't set.
Hi, I think I follow the intent, but I got a little tripped up here: patch 08
(current patch) seems to assume "slab->frozen = 1" is already gone. That's true
after the whole series, but the removal only happens in patch 09.
Would it make sense to avoid relying on that assumption when looking at patch 08
in isolation?
>
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + object = slab->freelist;
> > + while (object && allocated < count) {
> > + p[allocated] = object;
> > + object = get_freepointer(s, object);
> > + maybe_wipe_obj_freeptr(s, p[allocated]);
> > +
> > + slab->inuse++;
> > + allocated++;
> > + }
> > + slab->freelist = object;
> > +
> > + if (slab->freelist) {
> > +
> > + if (allow_spin) {
> > + n = get_node(s, slab_nid(slab));
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
> > + }
> > + add_partial(n, slab, DEACTIVATE_TO_HEAD);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
> > + }
>
> So we should only do inc_slabs_node() here.
> This also addresses the problem in 9/20 that Hao Li pointed out...
Yes, thanks,
Looking at the patchset as a whole, I think this part - together with the later
removal of inc_slabs_node() - does address the issue.
>
> > + return allocated;
> > +}
> > +
>
> ...
>
> > +static unsigned int
> > +__refill_objects(struct kmem_cache *s, void **p, gfp_t gfp, unsigned int min,
> > + unsigned int max)
> > +{
> > + struct slab *slab, *slab2;
> > + struct partial_context pc;
> > + unsigned int refilled = 0;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + void *object;
> > + int node;
> > +
> > + pc.flags = gfp;
> > + pc.min_objects = min;
> > + pc.max_objects = max;
> > +
> > + node = numa_mem_id();
> > +
> > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!gfpflags_allow_spinning(gfp)))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + /* TODO: consider also other nodes? */
> > + if (!get_partial_node_bulk(s, get_node(s, node), &pc))
> > + goto new_slab;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(slab, slab2, &pc.slabs, slab_list) {
> > +
> > + list_del(&slab->slab_list);
> > +
> > + object = get_freelist_nofreeze(s, slab);
> > +
> > + while (object && refilled < max) {
> > + p[refilled] = object;
> > + object = get_freepointer(s, object);
> > + maybe_wipe_obj_freeptr(s, p[refilled]);
> > +
> > + refilled++;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Freelist had more objects than we can accomodate, we need to
> > + * free them back. We can treat it like a detached freelist, just
> > + * need to find the tail object.
> > + */
> > + if (unlikely(object)) {
> > + void *head = object;
> > + void *tail;
> > + int cnt = 0;
> > +
> > + do {
> > + tail = object;
> > + cnt++;
> > + object = get_freepointer(s, object);
> > + } while (object);
> > + do_slab_free(s, slab, head, tail, cnt, _RET_IP_);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (refilled >= max)
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(!list_empty(&pc.slabs))) {
> > + struct kmem_cache_node *n = get_node(s, node);
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(slab, slab2, &pc.slabs, slab_list) {
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(!slab->inuse && n->nr_partial >= s->min_partial))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + list_del(&slab->slab_list);
> > + add_partial(n, slab, DEACTIVATE_TO_HEAD);
> > + }
> > +
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
> > +
> > + /* any slabs left are completely free and for discard */
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(slab, slab2, &pc.slabs, slab_list) {
> > +
> > + list_del(&slab->slab_list);
> > + discard_slab(s, slab);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > +
> > + if (likely(refilled >= min))
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > +new_slab:
> > +
> > + slab = new_slab(s, pc.flags, node);
> > + if (!slab)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + stat(s, ALLOC_SLAB);
> > + inc_slabs_node(s, slab_nid(slab), slab->objects);
>
> And remove it from here.
>
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * TODO: possible optimization - if we know we will consume the whole
> > + * slab we might skip creating the freelist?
> > + */
> > + refilled += alloc_from_new_slab(s, slab, p + refilled, max - refilled,
> > + /* allow_spin = */ true);
> > +
> > + if (refilled < min)
> > + goto new_slab;
> > +out:
> > +
> > + return refilled;
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline
> > int __kmem_cache_alloc_bulk(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, size_t size,
> > void **p)
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-16 6:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-12 15:16 [PATCH RFC v2 00/20] slab: replace cpu (partial) slabs with sheaves Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-12 15:16 ` [PATCH RFC v2 01/20] mm/slab: add rcu_barrier() to kvfree_rcu_barrier_on_cache() Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-13 2:08 ` Harry Yoo
2026-01-13 9:32 ` Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-13 12:31 ` Harry Yoo
2026-01-13 13:09 ` Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-14 11:14 ` Harry Yoo
2026-01-14 13:02 ` Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-15 23:52 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-01-14 4:56 ` Harry Yoo
2026-01-12 15:16 ` [PATCH RFC v2 02/20] mm/slab: move and refactor __kmem_cache_alias() Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-13 7:06 ` Harry Yoo
2026-01-16 0:06 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-01-12 15:16 ` [PATCH RFC v2 03/20] mm/slab: make caches with sheaves mergeable Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-13 7:47 ` Harry Yoo
2026-01-16 0:22 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-01-16 7:24 ` Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-16 8:46 ` Harry Yoo
2026-01-16 11:01 ` Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-16 11:10 ` Harry Yoo
2026-01-16 16:58 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-01-12 15:16 ` [PATCH RFC v2 04/20] slab: add sheaves to most caches Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-16 5:45 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-01-16 11:24 ` Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-16 16:59 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-01-16 6:46 ` Harry Yoo
2026-01-12 15:16 ` [PATCH RFC v2 05/20] slab: introduce percpu sheaves bootstrap Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-13 12:49 ` Hao Li
2026-01-15 10:11 ` Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-16 7:29 ` Harry Yoo
2026-01-12 15:17 ` [PATCH RFC v2 06/20] slab: make percpu sheaves compatible with kmalloc_nolock()/kfree_nolock() Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-13 15:42 ` Hao Li
2026-01-15 11:07 ` Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-13 18:36 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-01-13 23:26 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-01-14 13:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-14 14:05 ` Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-14 15:07 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-01-12 15:17 ` [PATCH RFC v2 07/20] slab: handle kmalloc sheaves bootstrap Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-12 15:17 ` [PATCH RFC v2 08/20] slab: add optimized sheaf refill from partial list Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-15 14:25 ` Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-16 6:27 ` Hao Li [this message]
2026-01-16 7:32 ` Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-16 7:56 ` Hao Li
2026-01-12 15:17 ` [PATCH RFC v2 09/20] slab: remove cpu (partial) slabs usage from allocation paths Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-14 6:07 ` Hao Li
2026-01-15 13:53 ` Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-12 15:17 ` [PATCH RFC v2 10/20] slab: remove SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-12 15:17 ` [PATCH RFC v2 11/20] slab: remove the do_slab_free() fastpath Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-12 15:17 ` [PATCH RFC v2 12/20] slab: remove defer_deactivate_slab() Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-15 14:09 ` Hao Li
2026-01-15 14:47 ` Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-12 15:17 ` [PATCH RFC v2 13/20] slab: simplify kmalloc_nolock() Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-14 3:31 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-01-12 15:17 ` [PATCH RFC v2 14/20] slab: remove struct kmem_cache_cpu Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-12 15:17 ` [PATCH RFC v2 15/20] slab: remove unused PREEMPT_RT specific macros Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-12 15:17 ` [PATCH RFC v2 16/20] slab: refill sheaves from all nodes Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-12 15:17 ` [PATCH RFC v2 17/20] slab: update overview comments Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-12 15:17 ` [PATCH RFC v2 18/20] slab: remove frozen slab checks from __slab_free() Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-12 15:17 ` [PATCH RFC v2 19/20] mm/slub: remove DEACTIVATE_TO_* stat items Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-12 15:17 ` [PATCH RFC v2 20/20] mm/slub: cleanup and repurpose some " Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-12 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 00/20] slab: replace cpu (partial) slabs with sheaves Vlastimil Babka
2026-01-15 15:12 ` [PATCH RFC " Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=kp7fvhxxjyyzk47n67m4xwzgm7gxoqmgglqdvzpkcxqb26sjc4@bu4lil75nc3c \
--to=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ptesarik@suse.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox