From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+131f9eb2b5807573275c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mmap_lock: Reset maple state on lock_vma_under_rcu() retry
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 19:19:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <kfqzb2dfxubn6twcbiu3frihfkf6u34g2rcnui2m63rbc4x4kk@dh3bxvpzpnmp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuCfpESKECudgqvm8CQ_whi761hWRPAhurR5efRVC4Hp2r8Qw@mail.gmail.com>
* Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> [251111 19:11]:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 2:18 PM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> wrote:
> >
> > On 11/11/25 22:56, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> > > The retry in lock_vma_under_rcu() drops the rcu read lock before
> > > reacquiring the lock and trying again. This may cause a use-after-free
> > > if the maple node the maple state was using was freed.
>
> Ah, good catch. I didn't realize the state is RCU protected.
>
> > >
> > > The maple state is protected by the rcu read lock. When the lock is
> > > dropped, the state cannot be reused as it tracks pointers to objects
> > > that may be freed during the time where the lock was not held.
> > >
> > > Any time the rcu read lock is dropped, the maple state must be
> > > invalidated. Resetting the address and state to MA_START is the safest
> > > course of action, which will result in the next operation starting from
> > > the top of the tree.
> > >
> > > Prior to commit 0b16f8bed19c ("mm: change vma_start_read() to drop RCU
> > > lock on failure"), the rcu read lock was dropped and NULL was returned,
> > > so the retry would not have happened. However, now that the read lock
> > > is dropped regardless of the return, we may use a freed maple tree node
> > > cached in the maple state on retry.
>
> Hmm. The above paragraph does not sound right to me, unless I
> completely misunderstood it. Before 0b16f8bed19c we would keep RCU
> lock up until the end of lock_vma_under_rcu(),
Ah.. usually, yes? But.. if (unlikely(vma->vm_mm != mm)), then we'd
drop and reacquire the rcu read lock, but return NULL. This was fine
because we wouldn't return -EAGIAN and so the read lock was toggled..
but it didn't matter since we wouldn't reuse the maple state.
I wanted to make it clear that the dropping/reacquiring of the rcu lock
prior to 0b16f8bed19c does not mean we have to backport the fix
further.. which I failed to do, I guess.
> so retries could still
> happen but we were not dropping the RCU lock while doing that. After
> 0b16f8bed19c we drop RCU lock if vma_start_read() fails, so retrying
> after such failure becomes unsafe. So, if you agree with me assessment
> then I suggest changing it to:
>
> Prior to commit 0b16f8bed19c ("mm: change vma_start_read() to drop RCU
> lock on failure"), the retry after vma_start_read() failure was
> happening under the same RCU lock. However, now that the read lock is
> dropped on failure, we may use a freed maple tree node cached in the
> maple state on retry.
This is also true, but fails to capture the fact that returning NULL
after toggling the lock prior to 0b16f8bed19c is okay.
>
> > >
> > > Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > Fixes: 0b16f8bed19c ("mm: change vma_start_read() to drop RCU lock on failure")
> >
> > The commit is 6.18-rc1 so we don't need Cc: stable, but it's a mm-hotfixes
> > material that must go to Linus before 6.18.
> >
> > > Reported-by: syzbot+131f9eb2b5807573275c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > > Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=131f9eb2b5807573275c
> > > Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
>
> With the changelog text sorted out.
>
> Reviewed-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
>
> Thanks!
>
> >
> > > ---
> > > mm/mmap_lock.c | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/mm/mmap_lock.c b/mm/mmap_lock.c
> > > index 39f341caf32c0..f2532af6208c0 100644
> > > --- a/mm/mmap_lock.c
> > > +++ b/mm/mmap_lock.c
> > > @@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct *lock_vma_under_rcu(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > > if (PTR_ERR(vma) == -EAGAIN) {
> > > count_vm_vma_lock_event(VMA_LOCK_MISS);
> > > /* The area was replaced with another one */
> > > + mas_set(&mas, address);
> > > goto retry;
> > > }
> > >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-12 0:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-11 21:56 Liam R. Howlett
2025-11-11 22:18 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-12 0:10 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-11-12 0:19 ` Liam R. Howlett [this message]
2025-11-12 0:45 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-11-12 2:18 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-11-12 20:24 ` Andrew Morton
2025-11-12 15:06 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-12 16:10 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-11-13 15:15 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-13 0:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-11-13 1:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-11-13 11:05 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-21 9:08 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-21 16:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-11-13 10:45 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-13 17:28 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-11-14 11:51 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-14 17:18 ` Liam R. Howlett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=kfqzb2dfxubn6twcbiu3frihfkf6u34g2rcnui2m63rbc4x4kk@dh3bxvpzpnmp \
--to=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=syzbot+131f9eb2b5807573275c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox