From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, oleg@redhat.com, brauner@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] pid: sprinkle tasklist_lock asserts
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 15:42:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jamcxevfeuzsqhsj7b5o7jt2avfqpqmcahwadiwnayj6cwqpvf@psksqzyktksg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGudoHGPAQYwVUEYgxMYZ808=wAO3RteLsqNgG21pvE8Gfs_eQ@mail.gmail.com>
* Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com> [250205 15:34]:
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 9:27 PM Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> > * Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com> [250205 14:33]:
> >
> > If a patch is worth doing, it's worth explaining. I'm surprised you
> > didn't add a comment after the last revision missed a comment on patch
> > 2/6. This is literally in the submitting patches document [1].
> >
> > I don't mean to delay this series, but I do want to know why things are
> > done when I'm hunting through git logs. Having a change log isn't
> > optional, and now you know that Andrews script won't fix this problem
> > [2].
> >
> > I see you are upset by this considering the terse and lack of
> > punctuation in patch 2, but please try to understand these comments
> > serve a purpose in maintaining the code years later.
> >
>
> I'm not upset.
Good, thanks - that wasn't my intention.
>
> For this specific case I don't know what can be written in the body
> given the really self-explanatory nature of the change, other than to
> spell it out(?).
You could say why you added it? Is this something that was seen
happening?
>
> Does this work for you:
> The routines need to be called with the tasklist_lock, the asserts
> validate at runtime that this holds.
Well, you are checking this lock because it is protecting something
that's being changed. You could say "the tasklist_lock protects X, make
sure that it's held"?
>
> I also git log a lot and like to know what's up, to that end I
> appreciate *short* commit messages so that I know there is nothing
> more to the patch than meets the eye. In particular if there is
> nothing of value to add in the body, I appreciate if there is none.
>
> But that's me, I'm not going to insist one way or the other.
>
> > [1]. https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.12/process/submitting-patches.html#describe-your-changes
> > [2]. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250203175128.80319b42c9739f0d420080a4@linux-foundation.org/
> >
> > > Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > kernel/pid.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/pid.c b/kernel/pid.c
> > > index 924084713be8..2ae872f689a7 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/pid.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/pid.c
> > > @@ -339,17 +339,23 @@ static struct pid **task_pid_ptr(struct task_struct *task, enum pid_type type)
> > > */
> > > void attach_pid(struct task_struct *task, enum pid_type type)
> > > {
> > > - struct pid *pid = *task_pid_ptr(task, type);
> > > + struct pid *pid;
> > > +
> > > + lockdep_assert_held_write(&tasklist_lock);
> > > +
> > > + pid = *task_pid_ptr(task, type);
> > > hlist_add_head_rcu(&task->pid_links[type], &pid->tasks[type]);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static void __change_pid(struct task_struct *task, enum pid_type type,
> > > struct pid *new)
> > > {
> > > - struct pid **pid_ptr = task_pid_ptr(task, type);
> > > - struct pid *pid;
> > > + struct pid **pid_ptr, *pid;
> > > int tmp;
> > >
> > > + lockdep_assert_held_write(&tasklist_lock);
> > > +
> > > + pid_ptr = task_pid_ptr(task, type);
> > > pid = *pid_ptr;
> > >
> > > hlist_del_rcu(&task->pid_links[type]);
> > > @@ -386,6 +392,8 @@ void exchange_tids(struct task_struct *left, struct task_struct *right)
> > > struct hlist_head *head1 = &pid1->tasks[PIDTYPE_PID];
> > > struct hlist_head *head2 = &pid2->tasks[PIDTYPE_PID];
> > >
> > > + lockdep_assert_held_write(&tasklist_lock);
> > > +
> > > /* Swap the single entry tid lists */
> > > hlists_swap_heads_rcu(head1, head2);
> > >
> > > @@ -403,6 +411,7 @@ void transfer_pid(struct task_struct *old, struct task_struct *new,
> > > enum pid_type type)
> > > {
> > > WARN_ON_ONCE(type == PIDTYPE_PID);
> > > + lockdep_assert_held_write(&tasklist_lock);
> > > hlist_replace_rcu(&old->pid_links[type], &new->pid_links[type]);
> > > }
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.43.0
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-05 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-05 19:32 [PATCH v4 0/5] reduce tasklist_lock hold time on exit and do some pid cleanup Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-05 19:32 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] exit: perform add_device_randomness() without tasklist_lock Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-05 19:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-05 20:00 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-05 19:32 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] exit: hoist get_pid() in release_task() outside of tasklist_lock Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-05 19:32 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] pid: sprinkle tasklist_lock asserts Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-05 20:26 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-02-05 20:34 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-05 20:42 ` Liam R. Howlett [this message]
2025-02-05 20:58 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-05 19:32 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] pid: perform free_pid() calls outside of tasklist_lock Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-05 19:32 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] pid: drop irq disablement around pidmap_lock Mateusz Guzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jamcxevfeuzsqhsj7b5o7jt2avfqpqmcahwadiwnayj6cwqpvf@psksqzyktksg \
--to=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox