linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	 Gregory Price <gourry.memverge@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com,  weixugc@google.com,
	apopple@nvidia.com, tim.c.chen@intel.com, dave.hansen@intel.com,
	 shy828301@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	rafael@kernel.org,  Gregory Price <gregory.price@memverge.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] Node Weights and Weighted Interleave
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2023 15:01:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ivhxexthtfums73nkko6yoy635h3cpetv4sqaemrmqd5pbhpq6@6zrizaoxgdwi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87msvy6wn8.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>

On Wed 01-11-23 10:21:47, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> writes:
[...]
> > Well, I am not convinced about that TBH. Sure it is probably a good fit
> > for this specific CXL usecase but it just doesn't fit into many others I
> > can think of - e.g. proportional use of those tiers based on the
> > workload - you get what you pay for.
> 
> For "pay", per my understanding, we need some cgroup based
> per-memory-tier (or per-node) usage limit.  The following patchset is
> the first step for that.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/cover.1655242024.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com/

Why do we need a sysfs interface if there are plans for cgroup API?

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs


  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-01 14:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-31  0:38 Gregory Price
2023-10-31  0:38 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] base/node.c: initialize the accessor list before registering Gregory Price
2023-10-31  0:38 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] node: add accessors to sysfs when nodes are created Gregory Price
2023-10-31  0:38 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] node: add interleave weights to node accessor Gregory Price
2023-10-31  0:38 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/4] mm/mempolicy: modify interleave mempolicy to use node weights Gregory Price
2023-10-31 17:52   ` [EXT] " Srinivasulu Thanneeru
2023-10-31 18:23   ` Srinivasulu Thanneeru
2023-10-31  9:53 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] Node Weights and Weighted Interleave Michal Hocko
2023-10-31 15:21   ` Johannes Weiner
2023-10-31 15:56     ` Michal Hocko
2023-10-31  4:27       ` Gregory Price
2023-11-01 13:45         ` Michal Hocko
2023-11-01 16:58           ` Gregory Price
2023-11-02  9:47             ` Michal Hocko
2023-11-02  3:18               ` Gregory Price
2023-11-03  7:45                 ` Huang, Ying
2023-11-03 14:16                   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-11-06  3:20                     ` Huang, Ying
2023-11-03  9:56                 ` Michal Hocko
2023-11-02 18:21                   ` Gregory Price
2023-11-03 16:59                     ` Michal Hocko
2023-11-02  2:01         ` Huang, Ying
2023-10-31 16:22       ` Johannes Weiner
2023-10-31  4:29         ` Gregory Price
2023-11-01  2:34         ` Huang, Ying
2023-11-01  9:29           ` Ravi Jonnalagadda
2023-11-02  6:41             ` Huang, Ying
2023-11-02  9:35               ` Ravi Jonnalagadda
2023-11-02 14:13                 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-11-03  7:00                 ` Huang, Ying
2023-11-01 13:56         ` Michal Hocko
2023-11-02  6:21           ` Huang, Ying
2023-11-02  9:30             ` Michal Hocko
2023-11-01  2:21       ` Huang, Ying
2023-11-01 14:01         ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2023-11-02  6:11           ` Huang, Ying
2023-11-02  9:28             ` Michal Hocko
2023-11-03  7:10               ` Huang, Ying
2023-11-03  9:39                 ` Michal Hocko
2023-11-06  5:08                   ` Huang, Ying

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ivhxexthtfums73nkko6yoy635h3cpetv4sqaemrmqd5pbhpq6@6zrizaoxgdwi \
    --to=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=gourry.memverge@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gregory.price@memverge.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox