From: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
To: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
yosryahmed@google.com, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, muchun.song@linux.dev, davidf@vimeo.com,
vbabka@suse.cz, handai.szj@taobao.com, rientjes@google.com,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
chenridong@huawei.com, wangweiyang2@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] memcg: fix soft lockup in the OOM process
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 17:18:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ilnyxm3qdk5ix75tfketinbhm6ubrkklrafbvmcwrsnjlgnh35@sjltlqp434fv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241224025238.3768787-1-chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 984 bytes --]
Hello.
On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 02:52:38AM +0000, Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com> wrote:
> A soft lockup issue was found in the product with about 56,000 tasks were
> in the OOM cgroup, it was traversing them when the soft lockup was
> triggered.
Why is this softlockup a problem?
It's lot of tasks afterall and possibly a slow console (given looking
for a victim among the comparable number didn't trigger it).
> To fix this issue, call 'cond_resched' in the 'mem_cgroup_scan_tasks'
> function per 1000 iterations. For global OOM, call
> 'touch_softlockup_watchdog' per 1000 iterations to avoid this issue.
This only hides the issue. It could be similarly fixed by simply
decreasing loglevel= ;-)
cond_resched() in the memcg case may be OK but the arbitrary touch for
global situation may hide possibly useful troubleshooting information.
(Yeah, cond_resched() won't fit inside RCU section as in other global
task iterations.)
0.02€,
Michal
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-03 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-24 2:52 Chen Ridong
2024-12-24 23:06 ` David Rientjes
2025-01-03 16:18 ` Michal Koutný [this message]
2025-01-04 0:52 ` Chen Ridong
2025-01-06 8:45 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-01-13 6:51 ` Chen Ridong
2025-01-14 3:45 ` Andrew Morton
2025-01-14 8:40 ` Michal Hocko
2025-01-14 9:20 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-01-14 9:30 ` Michal Hocko
2025-01-14 12:19 ` Chen Ridong
2025-01-14 12:13 ` Chen Ridong
2025-01-14 18:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-17 6:59 ` chenridong
2025-01-06 9:29 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ilnyxm3qdk5ix75tfketinbhm6ubrkklrafbvmcwrsnjlgnh35@sjltlqp434fv \
--to=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
--cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=davidf@vimeo.com \
--cc=handai.szj@taobao.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=wangweiyang2@huawei.com \
--cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox