From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, kent.overstreet@linux.dev,
vbabka@suse.cz, hannes@cmpxchg.org, usamaarif642@gmail.com,
rientjes@google.com, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
harry.yoo@oracle.com, 00107082@163.com,
pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, souravpanda@google.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] alloc_tag: mark inaccurate allocation counters in /proc/allocinfo output
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 22:18:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <hp7kdpo4wqlyge2mjivfieibcfxu2jxestrqfwll27v4gsoqja@stvbcth6zc5v> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250909234942.1104356-1-surenb@google.com>
On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 04:49:42PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> While rare, memory allocation profiling can contain inaccurate counters
> if slab object extension vector allocation fails. That allocation might
> succeed later but prior to that, slab allocations that would have used
> that object extension vector will not be accounted for. To indicate
> incorrect counters, mark them with an asterisk in the /proc/allocinfo
> output.
> Bump up /proc/allocinfo version to reflect change in the file format.
>
> Example output with invalid counters:
> allocinfo - version: 2.0
> 0 0 arch/x86/kernel/kdebugfs.c:105 func:create_setup_data_nodes
> 0 0 arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:2090 func:alternatives_smp_module_add
> 0* 0* arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:127 func:__its_alloc
> 0 0 arch/x86/kernel/fpu/regset.c:160 func:xstateregs_set
> 0 0 arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c:1590 func:fpstate_realloc
> 0 0 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c:379 func:arch_enable_hybrid_capacity_scale
> 0 0 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd_cache_disable.c:258 func:init_amd_l3_attrs
> 49152* 48* arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c:2709 func:mce_device_create
> 32768 1 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/genpool.c:132 func:mce_gen_pool_create
> 0 0 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c:1341 func:mce_threshold_create_device
>
> Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-10 5:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-09 23:49 Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-09-10 5:18 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2025-09-10 6:25 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-09-10 14:50 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-09-10 21:02 ` Usama Arif
2025-09-11 12:30 ` Johannes Weiner
2025-09-11 15:03 ` David Wang
2025-09-11 15:47 ` [PATCH " Yueyang Pan
2025-09-11 16:00 ` Usama Arif
2025-09-11 16:18 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-09-11 17:25 ` Yueyang Pan
2025-09-11 17:35 ` David Wang
2025-09-11 18:13 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-09-11 18:51 ` Yueyang Pan
2025-09-11 19:59 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-09-11 21:31 ` Andrew Morton
2025-09-12 0:25 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-09-12 2:02 ` David Wang
2025-09-12 10:52 ` Yueyang Pan
2025-09-12 19:38 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-09-15 18:31 ` Yueyang Pan
2025-09-15 23:04 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=hp7kdpo4wqlyge2mjivfieibcfxu2jxestrqfwll27v4gsoqja@stvbcth6zc5v \
--to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=00107082@163.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=souravpanda@google.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox