From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Nikita Kalyazin <kalyazin@amazon.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: selftests: test userfaultfd minor for guest_memfd
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 10:23:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fml27mxsuif3zbnbpperflml24ftis7uhdu5jymrajb3hroqts@wlxrnzxaigrs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251125183840.2368510-6-rppt@kernel.org>
* Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> [251125 13:39]:
> From: Nikita Kalyazin <kalyazin@amazon.com>
>
> The test demonstrates that a minor userfaultfd event in guest_memfd can
> be resolved via a memcpy followed by a UFFDIO_CONTINUE ioctl.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikita Kalyazin <kalyazin@amazon.com>
> Co-developed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
> ---
> .../testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 103 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c
> index e7d9aeb418d3..a5d3ed21d7bb 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c
> @@ -10,13 +10,17 @@
> #include <errno.h>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <fcntl.h>
> +#include <pthread.h>
>
> #include <linux/bitmap.h>
> #include <linux/falloc.h>
> #include <linux/sizes.h>
> +#include <linux/userfaultfd.h>
> #include <sys/mman.h>
> #include <sys/types.h>
> #include <sys/stat.h>
> +#include <sys/syscall.h>
> +#include <sys/ioctl.h>
>
> #include "kvm_util.h"
> #include "test_util.h"
> @@ -254,6 +258,104 @@ static void test_guest_memfd_flags(struct kvm_vm *vm)
> }
> }
>
> +struct fault_args {
> + char *addr;
> + volatile char value;
> +};
> +
> +static void *fault_thread_fn(void *arg)
> +{
> + struct fault_args *args = arg;
> +
> + /* Trigger page fault */
> + args->value = *args->addr;
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_uffd_minor(int fd, size_t total_size)
> +{
> + struct uffdio_api uffdio_api = {
> + .api = UFFD_API,
> + .features = UFFD_FEATURE_MINOR_GENERIC,
> + };
> + struct uffdio_register uffd_reg;
> + struct uffdio_continue uffd_cont;
> + struct uffd_msg msg;
> + struct fault_args args;
> + pthread_t fault_thread;
> + void *mem, *mem_nofault, *buf = NULL;
> + int uffd, ret;
> + off_t offset = page_size;
> + void *fault_addr;
> +
> + ret = posix_memalign(&buf, page_size, total_size);
> + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
> +
> + memset(buf, 0xaa, total_size);
> +
> + uffd = syscall(__NR_userfaultfd, O_CLOEXEC);
> + TEST_ASSERT(uffd != -1, "userfaultfd creation should succeed");
> +
> + ret = ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_API, &uffdio_api);
> + TEST_ASSERT(ret != -1, "ioctl(UFFDIO_API) should succeed");
> +
> + mem = mmap(NULL, total_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
> + TEST_ASSERT(mem != MAP_FAILED, "mmap should succeed");
> +
> + mem_nofault = mmap(NULL, total_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
> + TEST_ASSERT(mem_nofault != MAP_FAILED, "mmap should succeed");
> +
> + uffd_reg.range.start = (unsigned long)mem;
> + uffd_reg.range.len = total_size;
> + uffd_reg.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MINOR;
> + ret = ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_REGISTER, &uffd_reg);
> + TEST_ASSERT(ret != -1, "ioctl(UFFDIO_REGISTER) should succeed");
> +
> + ret = fallocate(fd, FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE,
> + offset, page_size);
> + TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "fallocate(PUNCH_HOLE) should succeed");
> +
> + fault_addr = mem + offset;
> + args.addr = fault_addr;
> +
> + ret = pthread_create(&fault_thread, NULL, fault_thread_fn, &args);
> + TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "pthread_create should succeed");
> +
> + ret = read(uffd, &msg, sizeof(msg));
> + TEST_ASSERT(ret != -1, "read from userfaultfd should succeed");
> + TEST_ASSERT(msg.event == UFFD_EVENT_PAGEFAULT, "event type should be pagefault");
> + TEST_ASSERT((void *)(msg.arg.pagefault.address & ~(page_size - 1)) == fault_addr,
> + "pagefault should occur at expected address");
> +
> + memcpy(mem_nofault + offset, buf + offset, page_size);
> +
> + uffd_cont.range.start = (unsigned long)fault_addr;
> + uffd_cont.range.len = page_size;
> + uffd_cont.mode = 0;
> + ret = ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_CONTINUE, &uffd_cont);
> + TEST_ASSERT(ret != -1, "ioctl(UFFDIO_CONTINUE) should succeed");
> +
> + /*
> + * wait for fault_thread to finish to make sure fault happened and was
> + * resolved before we verify the values
> + */
> + ret = pthread_join(fault_thread, NULL);
> + TEST_ASSERT(ret == 0, "pthread_join should succeed");
> +
> + TEST_ASSERT(args.value == *(char *)(mem_nofault + offset),
> + "memory should contain the value that was copied");
> + TEST_ASSERT(args.value == *(char *)(mem + offset),
> + "no further fault is expected");
> +
> + ret = munmap(mem_nofault, total_size);
> + TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "munmap should succeed");
> +
> + ret = munmap(mem, total_size);
> + TEST_ASSERT(!ret, "munmap should succeed");
> + free(buf);
> + close(uffd);
> +}
> +
> #define gmem_test(__test, __vm, __flags) \
> do { \
> int fd = vm_create_guest_memfd(__vm, page_size * 4, __flags); \
> @@ -273,6 +375,7 @@ static void __test_guest_memfd(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint64_t flags)
> if (flags & GUEST_MEMFD_FLAG_INIT_SHARED) {
> gmem_test(mmap_supported, vm, flags);
> gmem_test(fault_overflow, vm, flags);
> + gmem_test(uffd_minor, vm, flags);
> } else {
> gmem_test(fault_private, vm, flags);
> }
> --
> 2.50.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-26 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-25 18:38 [PATCH v2 0/5] mm, kvm: add guest_memfd support for uffd minor faults Mike Rapoport
2025-11-25 18:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] userfaultfd: move vma_can_userfault out of line Mike Rapoport
2025-11-26 15:05 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-11-25 18:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] userfaultfd, shmem: use a VMA callback to handle UFFDIO_CONTINUE Mike Rapoport
2025-11-26 10:21 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-26 15:11 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-11-25 18:38 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mm: introduce VM_FAULT_UFFD_MINOR fault reason Mike Rapoport
2025-11-25 19:21 ` Peter Xu
2025-11-27 11:18 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-27 14:10 ` Peter Xu
2025-11-30 11:05 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-26 10:19 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-26 15:19 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-11-26 16:49 ` Nikita Kalyazin
2025-11-25 18:38 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] guest_memfd: add support for userfaultfd minor mode Mike Rapoport
2025-11-26 10:25 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-26 15:22 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-11-26 16:49 ` Nikita Kalyazin
2025-11-27 10:36 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-27 11:19 ` Nikita Kalyazin
2025-11-27 19:04 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-28 12:15 ` Nikita Kalyazin
2025-11-27 11:27 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-25 18:38 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: selftests: test userfaultfd minor for guest_memfd Mike Rapoport
2025-11-26 15:23 ` Liam R. Howlett [this message]
2025-11-26 16:49 ` Nikita Kalyazin
2025-11-27 10:39 ` Mike Rapoport
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-04-02 16:07 [PATCH v2 0/5] KVM: guest_memfd: support for uffd minor Nikita Kalyazin
2025-04-02 16:07 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: selftests: test userfaultfd minor for guest_memfd Nikita Kalyazin
2025-04-02 21:10 ` James Houghton
2025-04-03 17:02 ` Nikita Kalyazin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fml27mxsuif3zbnbpperflml24ftis7uhdu5jymrajb3hroqts@wlxrnzxaigrs \
--to=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=kalyazin@amazon.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox