From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07A2C10F1B for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 09:29:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 00F0F8E0002; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 04:29:43 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id F01208E0001; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 04:29:42 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id DF0BC8E0002; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 04:29:42 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0016.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.16]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43B28E0001 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 04:29:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin14.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB091C5F51 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 09:29:42 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 80265791004.14.711BA7F Received: from wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.130.52]) by imf19.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6201A0018 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 09:29:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf19.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (imf19.hostedemail.com: domain of regressions@leemhuis.info designates 80.237.130.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=regressions@leemhuis.info ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1671614981; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=O3JGPmdxmuZWy3PF9CgNNkQEx0Ti+6kdNXmYbSF65rg=; b=sjxUhcSsoFR0MqL9Ll5yLX+GM84xrE4p6OwryatOBTT/v45H3PKCiI1cnsqBWPOA3hg/ke RKvrw5J6bQrBlsIsE2b0wIUfFcp4VEf4c8OyIHHfIAfWxSPeREuhG4N8Na9hKfAxGZM2fQ o7607Mmmh/IbJHIpYuVqcfNywhwyHDk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf19.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (imf19.hostedemail.com: domain of regressions@leemhuis.info designates 80.237.130.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=regressions@leemhuis.info ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1671614981; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=XQRYzy9Jck8YVpRGmTI1TmEnxnBBboM59wsWmRpFHz0pDNCQX0A7FHS06eR677335ScvUG wEXa4h/pyEezf/6MrTZvxeTQRhcgy5FXLnB+0x5AjmHeFhCSPljjaShLQCJw1kqJSETrCo okWvRl1xgrav2UVaBChQ37ByUUd58yY= Received: from [2a02:8108:963f:de38:eca4:7d19:f9a2:22c5]; authenticated by wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1p7vPu-0007Nq-37; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 10:29:38 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 10:29:37 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] ipc/mqueue: introduce msg cache Content-Language: en-US, de-DE To: Roman Gushchin , linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shakeel Butt , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Muchun Song , Andrew Morton , Waiman Long , Sven Luther References: <20221220184813.1908318-1-roman.gushchin@linux.dev> From: Thorsten Leemhuis In-Reply-To: <20221220184813.1908318-1-roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;regressions@leemhuis.info;1671614980;9141bc7a; X-HE-SMSGID: 1p7vPu-0007Nq-37 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam07 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: AF6201A0018 X-Rspam-User: X-Stat-Signature: 1nu8wity41xgbotgfur75paguau8pjgx X-HE-Tag: 1671614980-239386 X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX188bBGDwROjaSn3hIVm5xnPdKGjB6UabU3kAcuPrqufmw1Oe0I+dMrIF5RE1pVVAzyAQB+zLSNWUwGTUoNTUM9Nggm0LFmlJNajIEjc0p93/zEUxbU7PWj2TIxMbHqiWxeRr+twHynlyijC/TdZnZgp4aSe3tsS7KpXhwX0A6lKRbNGmcE3StlibcAxbnzEQ6nRTtMGd02AFE90V7bN/hGmL2UXBn1p944dWFnQnEjcnPZzshscoxx2/NbI/T1W4HAT/OgmqLxAj8ZfJ/t+2gKx7fQHMwsFVDWEPLWseqtw+aXg7uKFGOJk9qcXoQUxSIjAPywA9zL3rl/y6uldM96JdFE4h1mZqcfLUqyPxH7sCH1OSBSc7JmRL/07BA9/LvXr+9HPsPkcTVBFDm97RiUWtPdqkYn7Hknr527kb5c/e8zn4tfNYpOLtNW4e/kWTbb4al8HNj99rvDdr8tGsk2/+PhQfyInUVEIqFZtvYajRPwj1KpGRRDoDHEbp10hLLzhqiqvkg+hQTDmx8+w4KX7XyDEAS2IbhxKB90xWx7lNFvZ1fZi+l71zzuJIoOue3EezBEY1korp9N7CJp+lRoR4gknWnVtHDNEFGDvFd2+vqAAb6exLOK3eKrsvkhqz4h0HWojs5Pc/oYRrQvUW7a67gVubhPzphB/mXefAyF+eO1Ik96jU7WT5fKSBfhHo+ZHxXsPMtlSY1Tq3jbt3gXW8s5M+FfL1vvPGxHmeGBpzk+20/ffJbTo38eOBP78aEI= X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 20.12.22 19:48, Roman Gushchin wrote: > Sven Luther reported a regression in the posix message queues > performance caused by switching to the per-object tracking of > slab objects introduced by patch series ending with the > commit 10befea91b61 ("mm: memcg/slab: use a single set of kmem_caches for all > allocations"). > [...] Thx for looking into this > The last line reflects the result with this patch ("6.1-rc8+p"). > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/Y46lqCToUa%2FBgt%2Fc@P9FQF9L96D/T/ This link... > Reported-by: Sven Luther ...should be here and look like this, as tools like regzbot otherwise won't do the right thing: Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/Y46lqCToUa%2FBgt%2Fc@P9FQF9L96D/ [1] For details, see: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wjMmSZzMJ3Xnskdg4+GGz=5p5p+GSYyFBTh0f-DgvdBWg@mail.gmail.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgs38ZrfPvy=nOwVkVzjpM3VFU1zobP37Fwd_h9iAD5JQ@mail.gmail.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wjxzafG-=J8oT30s7upn4RhBs6TX-uVFZ5rME+L5_DoJA@mail.gmail.com/ Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst (http://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html) Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst (https://docs.kernel.org/process/5.Posting.html) > Tested-by: Sven Luther > Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin #regzbot ^backmonitor: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/Y46lqCToUa%2FBgt%2Fc@P9FQF9L96D/ Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I deal with a lot of reports and sometimes miss something important when writing mails like this. If that's the case here, don't hesitate to tell me in a public reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight.