From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: kent.overstreet@linux.dev, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
usamaarif642@gmail.com, rientjes@google.com,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, harry.yoo@oracle.com,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, 00107082@163.com,
pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, souravpanda@google.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] alloc_tag: mark inaccurate allocation counters in /proc/allocinfo output
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 08:25:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff28f071-f448-4f25-bea0-17db946e0acf@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250909234942.1104356-1-surenb@google.com>
On 9/10/25 01:49, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> While rare, memory allocation profiling can contain inaccurate counters
> if slab object extension vector allocation fails. That allocation might
> succeed later but prior to that, slab allocations that would have used
> that object extension vector will not be accounted for. To indicate
> incorrect counters, mark them with an asterisk in the /proc/allocinfo
> output.
> Bump up /proc/allocinfo version to reflect change in the file format.
Since it's rare, is it worth the trouble?
> Example output with invalid counters:
> allocinfo - version: 2.0
> 0 0 arch/x86/kernel/kdebugfs.c:105 func:create_setup_data_nodes
> 0 0 arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:2090 func:alternatives_smp_module_add
> 0* 0* arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:127 func:__its_alloc
> 0 0 arch/x86/kernel/fpu/regset.c:160 func:xstateregs_set
> 0 0 arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c:1590 func:fpstate_realloc
> 0 0 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c:379 func:arch_enable_hybrid_capacity_scale
> 0 0 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd_cache_disable.c:258 func:init_amd_l3_attrs
> 49152* 48* arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c:2709 func:mce_device_create
> 32768 1 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/genpool.c:132 func:mce_gen_pool_create
> 0 0 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c:1341 func:mce_threshold_create_device
>
> Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Here a link might have been helpful :)
> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> ---
> Patch is based on mm-new.
>
> include/linux/alloc_tag.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> include/linux/codetag.h | 5 ++++-
> lib/alloc_tag.c | 7 +++++--
> mm/slub.c | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/alloc_tag.h b/include/linux/alloc_tag.h
> index 9ef2633e2c08..d40ac39bfbe8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/alloc_tag.h
> +++ b/include/linux/alloc_tag.h
> @@ -221,6 +221,16 @@ static inline void alloc_tag_sub(union codetag_ref *ref, size_t bytes)
> ref->ct = NULL;
> }
>
> +static inline void alloc_tag_set_inaccurate(struct alloc_tag *tag)
> +{
> + tag->ct.flags |= CODETAG_FLAG_INACCURATE;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool alloc_tag_is_inaccurate(struct alloc_tag *tag)
> +{
> + return !!(tag->ct.flags & CODETAG_FLAG_INACCURATE);
> +}
> +
> #define alloc_tag_record(p) ((p) = current->alloc_tag)
>
> #else /* CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING */
> @@ -230,6 +240,8 @@ static inline bool mem_alloc_profiling_enabled(void) { return false; }
> static inline void alloc_tag_add(union codetag_ref *ref, struct alloc_tag *tag,
> size_t bytes) {}
> static inline void alloc_tag_sub(union codetag_ref *ref, size_t bytes) {}
> +static inline void alloc_tag_set_inaccurate(struct alloc_tag *tag) {}
> +static inline bool alloc_tag_is_inaccurate(struct alloc_tag *tag) { return false; }
> #define alloc_tag_record(p) do {} while (0)
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING */
> diff --git a/include/linux/codetag.h b/include/linux/codetag.h
> index 457ed8fd3214..8ea2a5f7c98a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/codetag.h
> +++ b/include/linux/codetag.h
> @@ -16,13 +16,16 @@ struct module;
> #define CODETAG_SECTION_START_PREFIX "__start_"
> #define CODETAG_SECTION_STOP_PREFIX "__stop_"
>
> +/* codetag flags */
> +#define CODETAG_FLAG_INACCURATE (1 << 0)
> +
> /*
> * An instance of this structure is created in a special ELF section at every
> * code location being tagged. At runtime, the special section is treated as
> * an array of these.
> */
> struct codetag {
> - unsigned int flags; /* used in later patches */
> + unsigned int flags;
> unsigned int lineno;
> const char *modname;
> const char *function;
> diff --git a/lib/alloc_tag.c b/lib/alloc_tag.c
> index e9b33848700a..a7f15117c759 100644
> --- a/lib/alloc_tag.c
> +++ b/lib/alloc_tag.c
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static void allocinfo_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *arg)
> static void print_allocinfo_header(struct seq_buf *buf)
> {
> /* Output format version, so we can change it. */
> - seq_buf_printf(buf, "allocinfo - version: 1.0\n");
> + seq_buf_printf(buf, "allocinfo - version: 2.0\n");
> seq_buf_printf(buf, "# <size> <calls> <tag info>\n");
> }
>
> @@ -90,7 +90,10 @@ static void alloc_tag_to_text(struct seq_buf *out, struct codetag *ct)
> struct alloc_tag_counters counter = alloc_tag_read(tag);
> s64 bytes = counter.bytes;
>
> - seq_buf_printf(out, "%12lli %8llu ", bytes, counter.calls);
> + if (unlikely(alloc_tag_is_inaccurate(tag)))
> + seq_buf_printf(out, "%11lli* %7llu* ", bytes, counter.calls);
> + else
> + seq_buf_printf(out, "%12lli %8llu ", bytes, counter.calls);
> codetag_to_text(out, ct);
> seq_buf_putc(out, ' ');
> seq_buf_putc(out, '\n');
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index af343ca570b5..9c04f29ee8de 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -2143,6 +2143,8 @@ __alloc_tagging_slab_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object, gfp_t flags)
> */
> if (likely(obj_exts))
> alloc_tag_add(&obj_exts->ref, current->alloc_tag, s->size);
> + else
> + alloc_tag_set_inaccurate(current->alloc_tag);
> }
>
> static inline void
>
> base-commit: f4e8f46973fe0c0f579944a37e96ba9efbe00cca
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-10 6:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-09 23:49 Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-09-10 5:18 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-09-10 6:25 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2025-09-10 14:50 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-09-10 21:02 ` Usama Arif
2025-09-11 12:30 ` Johannes Weiner
2025-09-11 15:03 ` David Wang
2025-09-11 15:47 ` [PATCH " Yueyang Pan
2025-09-11 16:00 ` Usama Arif
2025-09-11 16:18 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-09-11 17:25 ` Yueyang Pan
2025-09-11 17:35 ` David Wang
2025-09-11 18:13 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-09-11 18:51 ` Yueyang Pan
2025-09-11 19:59 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-09-11 21:31 ` Andrew Morton
2025-09-12 0:25 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-09-12 2:02 ` David Wang
2025-09-12 10:52 ` Yueyang Pan
2025-09-12 19:38 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-09-15 18:31 ` Yueyang Pan
2025-09-15 23:04 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ff28f071-f448-4f25-bea0-17db946e0acf@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=00107082@163.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=souravpanda@google.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox