From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] mm: Factor out the pagetable pages account into new helper function
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2022 21:48:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fedd6409-9bdb-1c1d-5fcd-28fc10f4e5b4@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YsAaxFg7w3OpY7eE@linux.ibm.com>
On 7/2/2022 6:15 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 04:00:59PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/30/2022 10:11 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 07:11:14PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>>> Factor out the pagetable pages account into new helper functions to avoid
>>>> duplicated code. Meanwhile these helper functions also will be used to
>>>> account pagetable pages which do not need split pagetale lock.
>>>>
>>>> Meanwhile convert to use mod_lruvec_page_state() in case of non-order-0
>>>> page table allocation.
>>>
>>> These are *very* rare. I think only parisc may have non-order-0 pmd and pud
>>> tables.
>>
>> s390 also has non-order-0 page table allocation, but they both do not use
>> the generic page table allocation now.
>>
>>> With that, I'd suggest making use of compound_nr() build time opt-in.
>>
>> After more thinking, I'd prefer to change back to use
>> inc_lruvec_page_state()/dec_lruvec_page_state(), since now no architecures
>> will need non-order-0 page table allocation.
>>
>> After this patchset, I plan to convert parisc and s390 to use generic
>> pagetable allocation, then I will add non-order-0 page table allocation
>> support. Like Matthew suggested, maybe I need change the API to pass the
>> number of pages.
>
> I think it would be simpler to add proper accounting to s390 and parisc
> versions than make them use the generic allocation functions. Moreover, API
> change to support these cases feels like unnecessary churn to me.
Got it. Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-03 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-30 11:11 [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] Add PUD and kernel PTE level pagetable account Baolin Wang
2022-06-30 11:11 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] mm: Factor out the pagetable pages account into new helper function Baolin Wang
2022-06-30 14:11 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-07-01 8:00 ` Baolin Wang
2022-07-02 10:15 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-07-03 13:48 ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2022-06-30 11:11 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/3] mm: Add PUD level pagetable account Baolin Wang
2022-06-30 14:17 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-07-01 8:04 ` Baolin Wang
2022-07-03 3:40 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-07-03 14:06 ` Baolin Wang
2022-07-03 14:28 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-07-03 14:49 ` Baolin Wang
2022-07-03 14:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-07-03 15:07 ` Baolin Wang
2022-07-03 3:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-07-03 14:18 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-06-30 11:11 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/3] mm: Add kernel PTE level pagetable pages account Baolin Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fedd6409-9bdb-1c1d-5fcd-28fc10f4e5b4@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox