From: "zhangpeng (AS)" <zhangpeng362@huawei.com>
To: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <willy@infradead.org>,
<fengwei.yin@intel.com>, <ying.huang@intel.com>,
<aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>, <shy828301@gmail.com>,
<hughd@google.com>, <david@redhat.com>,
<wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>, <sunnanyong@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: filemap: avoid unnecessary major faults in filemap_fault()
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 11:31:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fedd15a2-1c22-598d-beb7-ab514886ef35@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231124023107.571059-1-zhangpeng362@huawei.com>
please ignore this...
On 2023/11/24 10:31, Peng Zhang wrote:
> From: ZhangPeng <zhangpeng362@huawei.com>
>
> The major fault occurred when using mlockall(MCL_CURRENT | MCL_FUTURE)
> in application, which leading to an unexpected performance issue[1].
>
> This caused by temporarily cleared pte during a read/modify/write update
> of the pte, eg, do_numa_page()/change_pte_range().
>
> For the data segment of the user-mode program, the global variable area
> is a private mapping. After the pagecache is loaded, the private anonymous
> page is generated after the COW is triggered. Mlockall can lock COW pages
> (anonymous pages), but the original file pages cannot be locked and may
> be reclaimed. If the global variable (private anon page) is accessed when
> vmf->pte is zeroed in numa fault, a file page fault will be triggered.
>
> At this time, the original private file page may have been reclaimed.
> If the page cache is not available at this time, a major fault will be
> triggered and the file will be read, causing additional overhead.
>
> Fix this by rechecking the pte by holding ptl in filemap_fault() before
> triggering a major fault.
>
> We tested the performance of file private mapping page fault
> (page_fault2.c of will-it-scale [2]) and file shared mapping page fault
> (page_fault3.c of will-it-scale). The difference in performance (in
> operations per second) before and after patch applied is about 0.7% on a
> x86 physical machine.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/9e62fd9a-bee0-52bf-50a7-498fa17434ee@huawei.com/
> [2] https://github.com/antonblanchard/will-it-scale/tree/master
>
> Suggested-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: ZhangPeng <zhangpeng362@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@intel.com>
> ---
> RFC->v1: - Update commit message and add RB from Yin Fengwei
> - Add error handling when ptep == NULL per Huang, Ying and
> Matthew Wilcox
>
> mm/filemap.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> index 71f00539ac00..f3dcabdbc810 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -3226,6 +3226,20 @@ vm_fault_t filemap_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> mapping_locked = true;
> }
> } else {
> + pte_t *ptep = pte_offset_map_lock(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd,
> + vmf->address, &vmf->ptl);
> + if (unlikely(!ptep))
> + return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
> + /*
> + * Recheck pte with ptl locked as the pte can be cleared
> + * temporarily during a read/modify/write update.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(!pte_none(ptep_get(ptep))))
> + ret = VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
> + pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, vmf->ptl);
> + if (unlikely(ret))
> + return ret;
> +
> /* No page in the page cache at all */
> count_vm_event(PGMAJFAULT);
> count_memcg_event_mm(vmf->vma->vm_mm, PGMAJFAULT);
--
Best Regards,
Peng
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-24 3:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-24 2:31 Peng Zhang
2023-11-24 3:31 ` zhangpeng (AS) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fedd15a2-1c22-598d-beb7-ab514886ef35@huawei.com \
--to=zhangpeng362@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox