From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
Richard Chang <richardycc@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Make MIGRATE_ISOLATE a standalone bit
Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 22:26:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fed40607-edcd-4338-85ae-7656a374728b@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250509200111.3372279-1-ziy@nvidia.com>
On 5/9/25 22:01, Zi Yan wrote:
> Hi David and Oscar,
>
> Can you take a look at Patch 2, which changes how online_pages() set
> online pageblock migratetypes? It used to first set all pageblocks to
> MIGRATE_ISOLATE, then let undo_isolate_page_range() move the pageblocks
> to MIGRATE_MOVABLE. After MIGRATE_ISOLATE becomes a standalone bit, all
> online pageblocks need to have a migratetype other than MIGRATE_ISOLATE.
> Let me know if there is any issue with my changes.
>
> Hi Johannes,
>
> Patch 2 now have set_pageblock_migratetype() not accepting
> MIGRATE_ISOLATE. I think it makes code better. Thank you for the great
> feedback.
>
> Hi all,
>
> This patchset moves MIGRATE_ISOLATE to a standalone bit to avoid
> being overwritten during pageblock isolation process. Currently,
> MIGRATE_ISOLATE is part of enum migratetype (in include/linux/mmzone.h),
> thus, setting a pageblock to MIGRATE_ISOLATE overwrites its original
> migratetype. This causes pageblock migratetype loss during
> alloc_contig_range() and memory offline, especially when the process
> fails due to a failed pageblock isolation and the code tries to undo the
> finished pageblock isolations.
Seems mostly fine to me, just sent suggestion for 4/4.
I was kinda hoping that MIGRATE_ISOLATE could stop being a migratetype. But
I also see that it's useful for it to be because then it means it has the
freelists in the buddy allocator, can work via __move_freepages_block() etc.
Oh well. So it's still a migratetype, but the pageblock handling is now
different.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-17 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-09 20:01 Zi Yan
2025-05-09 20:01 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] mm/page_isolation: make page isolation " Zi Yan
2025-05-13 11:32 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-05-13 14:53 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-19 8:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-19 15:08 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-19 16:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-19 17:15 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-21 11:16 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-21 11:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-21 12:00 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-21 12:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-21 12:18 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-09 20:01 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] mm/page_isolation: remove migratetype from move_freepages_block_isolate() Zi Yan
2025-05-12 6:25 ` kernel test robot
2025-05-12 16:10 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-12 16:13 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-12 16:19 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-12 16:28 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-12 22:00 ` Andrew Morton
2025-05-12 23:20 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-19 8:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-19 23:06 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-20 8:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-09 20:01 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] mm/page_isolation: remove migratetype from undo_isolate_page_range() Zi Yan
2025-05-09 20:01 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] mm/page_isolation: remove migratetype parameter from more functions Zi Yan
2025-05-17 20:21 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-18 0:07 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-18 16:32 ` Johannes Weiner
2025-05-18 17:24 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-17 20:26 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2025-05-18 0:20 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] Make MIGRATE_ISOLATE a standalone bit Zi Yan
2025-05-19 14:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-19 14:35 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-20 8:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-20 13:18 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-20 13:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-20 13:31 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-20 13:33 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-20 14:07 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-19 7:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-19 14:01 ` Zi Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fed40607-edcd-4338-85ae-7656a374728b@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=richardycc@google.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox