From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
security@kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] mm/khugepaged: Take the right locks for page table retraction
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 14:52:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fec3f46e-a777-06e7-0ba0-a8cf169afa02@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221125213714.4115729-1-jannh@google.com>
On 25.11.22 22:37, Jann Horn wrote:
> pagetable walks on address ranges mapped by VMAs can be done under the mmap
> lock, the lock of an anon_vma attached to the VMA, or the lock of the VMA's
> address_space. Only one of these needs to be held, and it does not need to
> be held in exclusive mode.
>
> Under those circumstances, the rules for concurrent access to page table
> entries are:
>
> - Terminal page table entries (entries that don't point to another page
> table) can be arbitrarily changed under the page table lock, with the
> exception that they always need to be consistent for
> hardware page table walks and lockless_pages_from_mm().
> This includes that they can be changed into non-terminal entries.
> - Non-terminal page table entries (which point to another page table)
> can not be modified; readers are allowed to READ_ONCE() an entry, verify
> that it is non-terminal, and then assume that its value will stay as-is.
>
> Retracting a page table involves modifying a non-terminal entry, so
> page-table-level locks are insufficient to protect against concurrent
> page table traversal; it requires taking all the higher-level locks under
> which it is possible to start a page walk in the relevant range in
> exclusive mode.
>
> The collapse_huge_page() path for anonymous THP already follows this rule,
> but the shmem/file THP path was getting it wrong, making it possible for
> concurrent rmap-based operations to cause corruption.
This sounds sane and correct to me. No expert on file-THP, though.
For anon-THP it's the mmap lock and the rmap locks. I assume the only
difference for file-THP is that the rmap lock is actually the mapping
lock. Looking at rmap_walk_file(), that seems to be the case.
I wish at least PTE table removal could be done easier ... I already
experimented some time ago with some ideas (e.g., lock in PMD table
memmap) but it's all far from trivial and space in the memmap is rare.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-28 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-25 21:37 Jann Horn
2022-11-25 21:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/khugepaged: Fix GUP-fast interaction by sending IPI Jann Horn
2022-11-28 13:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-28 16:58 ` Jann Horn
2022-11-28 17:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-25 21:37 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mm/khugepaged: Invoke MMU notifiers in shmem/file collapse paths Jann Horn
2022-11-28 17:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-28 17:57 ` Jann Horn
2022-11-28 18:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-28 13:52 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2022-11-28 17:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mm/khugepaged: Take the right locks for page table retraction Jann Horn
2022-11-28 17:34 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fec3f46e-a777-06e7-0ba0-a8cf169afa02@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox