From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Subject: Re: gigantic hugepages vs. movable zones
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:56:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe817e86-c756-653f-1cd8-e7c8cf6779ee@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170727082258.GL20970@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 07/27/2017 10:22 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [CC for real]
>
> On Thu 27-07-17 10:12:36, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Thu 27-07-17 13:30:31, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/27/2017 12:58 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>>> On Thu 27-07-17 07:52:08, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>>>> Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> I've just noticed that alloc_gigantic_page ignores movability of the
>>>>>> gigantic page and it uses any existing zone. Considering that
>>>>>> hugepage_migration_supported only supports 2MB and pgd level hugepages
>>>>>> then 1GB pages are not migratable and as such allocating them from a
>>>>>> movable zone will break the basic expectation of this zone. Standard
>>>>>> hugetlb allocations try to avoid that by using htlb_alloc_mask and I
>>>>>> believe we should do the same for gigantic pages as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I suspect this behavior is not intentional. What do you think about the
>>>>>> following untested patch?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I also noticed an unrelated issue with the usage of
>>>>> start_isolate_page_range. On error we set the migrate type to
>>>>> MIGRATE_MOVABLE.
>>>>
>>>> Why that should be a problem? I think it is perfectly OK to have
>>>> MIGRATE_MOVABLE pageblocks inside kernel zones.
>>>>
>>>
>>> we can pick pages with migrate type movable and if we fail to isolate won't
^ CMA
>>> we set the migrate type of that pages to MOVABLE ?
Yes, it seems we can silently kill CMA pageblocks in such case. Joonsoo,
can you check?
>>
>> I do not see an immediate problem. GFP_KERNEL allocations can fallback
>> to movable migrate pageblocks AFAIR. But I am not very much familiar
>> with migratetypes. Vlastimil, could you have a look please?
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-27 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-26 10:50 Michal Hocko
2017-07-27 2:22 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-07-27 7:28 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-27 8:00 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-07-27 8:12 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-27 8:22 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-27 11:56 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2017-07-28 20:48 ` Mike Kravetz
2017-07-31 6:47 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fe817e86-c756-653f-1cd8-e7c8cf6779ee@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox