linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] mm: turn USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS / USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS into Kconfig options
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 15:56:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe50cde6-dc9f-49b0-9a9a-0d07fb643617@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240726150728.3159964-2-david@redhat.com>



On 2024/7/26 23:07, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Let's clean that up a bit and prepare for depending on
> CONFIG_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS in other Kconfig options.
> 
> More cleanups would be reasonable (like the arch-specific "depends on"
> for CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS), but we'll leave that for another day.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c      |  6 +++---
>   arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c         |  7 ++++---
>   include/linux/mm.h            |  8 ++++----
>   include/linux/mm_types.h      |  2 +-
>   include/linux/mm_types_task.h |  3 ---
>   kernel/fork.c                 |  4 ++--
>   mm/Kconfig                    | 18 +++++++++++-------
>   mm/memory.c                   |  2 +-
>   8 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

That's great. Thanks!

Reviewed-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>

> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c b/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c
> index 2286c2ea60ec4..831793cd6ff94 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c
> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static int do_adjust_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   
> -#if USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS)
>   /*
>    * If we are using split PTE locks, then we need to take the page
>    * lock here.  Otherwise we are using shared mm->page_table_lock
> @@ -80,10 +80,10 @@ static inline void do_pte_unlock(spinlock_t *ptl)
>   {
>   	spin_unlock(ptl);
>   }
> -#else /* !USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS */
> +#else /* !defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS) */
>   static inline void do_pte_lock(spinlock_t *ptl) {}
>   static inline void do_pte_unlock(spinlock_t *ptl) {}
> -#endif /* USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS */
> +#endif /* defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS) */
>   
>   static int adjust_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>   	unsigned long pfn)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c b/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c
> index f1ce39d6d32cb..f4a316894bbb4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c
> @@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ static spinlock_t *xen_pte_lock(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm)
>   {
>   	spinlock_t *ptl = NULL;
>   
> -#if USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS)
>   	ptl = ptlock_ptr(page_ptdesc(page));
>   	spin_lock_nest_lock(ptl, &mm->page_table_lock);
>   #endif
> @@ -1553,7 +1553,8 @@ static inline void xen_alloc_ptpage(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long pfn,
>   
>   		__set_pfn_prot(pfn, PAGE_KERNEL_RO);
>   
> -		if (level == PT_PTE && USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS && !pinned)
> +		if (level == PT_PTE && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS) &&
> +		    !pinned)
>   			__pin_pagetable_pfn(MMUEXT_PIN_L1_TABLE, pfn);
>   
>   		xen_mc_issue(XEN_LAZY_MMU);
> @@ -1581,7 +1582,7 @@ static inline void xen_release_ptpage(unsigned long pfn, unsigned level)
>   	if (pinned) {
>   		xen_mc_batch();
>   
> -		if (level == PT_PTE && USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS)
> +		if (level == PT_PTE && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS))
>   			__pin_pagetable_pfn(MMUEXT_UNPIN_TABLE, pfn);
>   
>   		__set_pfn_prot(pfn, PAGE_KERNEL);
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 0472a5090b180..dff43101572ec 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -2843,7 +2843,7 @@ static inline void pagetable_free(struct ptdesc *pt)
>   	__free_pages(page, compound_order(page));
>   }
>   
> -#if USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS)
>   #if ALLOC_SPLIT_PTLOCKS
>   void __init ptlock_cache_init(void);
>   bool ptlock_alloc(struct ptdesc *ptdesc);
> @@ -2895,7 +2895,7 @@ static inline bool ptlock_init(struct ptdesc *ptdesc)
>   	return true;
>   }
>   
> -#else	/* !USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS */
> +#else	/* !defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS) */
>   /*
>    * We use mm->page_table_lock to guard all pagetable pages of the mm.
>    */
> @@ -2906,7 +2906,7 @@ static inline spinlock_t *pte_lockptr(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *pte)
>   static inline void ptlock_cache_init(void) {}
>   static inline bool ptlock_init(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) { return true; }
>   static inline void ptlock_free(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) {}
> -#endif /* USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS */
> +#endif /* defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS) */
>   
>   static inline bool pagetable_pte_ctor(struct ptdesc *ptdesc)
>   {
> @@ -2966,7 +2966,7 @@ pte_t *pte_offset_map_nolock(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
>   	((unlikely(pmd_none(*(pmd))) && __pte_alloc_kernel(pmd))? \
>   		NULL: pte_offset_kernel(pmd, address))
>   
> -#if USE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS)
>   
>   static inline struct page *pmd_pgtable_page(pmd_t *pmd)
>   {
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> index 4854249792545..165c58b12ccc9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> @@ -947,7 +947,7 @@ struct mm_struct {
>   #ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER
>   		struct mmu_notifier_subscriptions *notifier_subscriptions;
>   #endif
> -#if defined(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) && !USE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS
> +#if defined(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) && !defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS)
>   		pgtable_t pmd_huge_pte; /* protected by page_table_lock */
>   #endif
>   #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types_task.h b/include/linux/mm_types_task.h
> index a2f6179b672b8..bff5706b76e14 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm_types_task.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types_task.h
> @@ -16,9 +16,6 @@
>   #include <asm/tlbbatch.h>
>   #endif
>   
> -#define USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS	(NR_CPUS >= CONFIG_SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS)
> -#define USE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS	(USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS && \
> -		IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK))
>   #define ALLOC_SPLIT_PTLOCKS	(SPINLOCK_SIZE > BITS_PER_LONG/8)
>   
>   /*
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index a8362c26ebcb0..216ce9ba4f4e6 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -832,7 +832,7 @@ static void check_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
>   		pr_alert("BUG: non-zero pgtables_bytes on freeing mm: %ld\n",
>   				mm_pgtables_bytes(mm));
>   
> -#if defined(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) && !USE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS
> +#if defined(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) && !defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS)
>   	VM_BUG_ON_MM(mm->pmd_huge_pte, mm);
>   #endif
>   }
> @@ -1276,7 +1276,7 @@ static struct mm_struct *mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *p,
>   	RCU_INIT_POINTER(mm->exe_file, NULL);
>   	mmu_notifier_subscriptions_init(mm);
>   	init_tlb_flush_pending(mm);
> -#if defined(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) && !USE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS
> +#if defined(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) && !defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS)
>   	mm->pmd_huge_pte = NULL;
>   #endif
>   	mm_init_uprobes_state(mm);
> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
> index b72e7d040f789..7b716ac802726 100644
> --- a/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -585,17 +585,21 @@ config ARCH_MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY_ENABLE
>   # at the same time (e.g. copy_page_range()).
>   # DEBUG_SPINLOCK and DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC spinlock_t also enlarge struct page.
>   #
> -config SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS
> -	int
> -	default "999999" if !MMU
> -	default "999999" if ARM && !CPU_CACHE_VIPT
> -	default "999999" if PARISC && !PA20
> -	default "999999" if SPARC32
> -	default "4"
> +config SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS
> +	def_bool y
> +	depends on MMU
> +	depends on NR_CPUS >= 4
> +	depends on !ARM || CPU_CACHE_VIPT
> +	depends on !PARISC || PA20
> +	depends on !SPARC32
>   
>   config ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK
>   	bool
>   
> +config SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS
> +	def_bool y
> +	depends on SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS && ARCH_ENABLE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCK
> +
>   #
>   # support for memory balloon
>   config MEMORY_BALLOON
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 833d2cad6eb29..714589582fe15 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -6559,7 +6559,7 @@ long copy_folio_from_user(struct folio *dst_folio,
>   }
>   #endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE || CONFIG_HUGETLBFS */
>   
> -#if USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS && ALLOC_SPLIT_PTLOCKS
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS) && ALLOC_SPLIT_PTLOCKS
>   
>   static struct kmem_cache *page_ptl_cachep;
>   


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-29  7:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-26 15:07 [PATCH v1 0/3] mm: split PTE/PMD PT table Kconfig cleanups+clarifications David Hildenbrand
2024-07-26 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] mm: turn USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS / USE_SPLIT_PTE_PTLOCKS into Kconfig options David Hildenbrand
2024-07-28 12:45   ` Mike Rapoport
2024-07-29  7:56   ` Qi Zheng [this message]
2024-07-29 11:33   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-07-26 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] mm/hugetlb: enforce that PMD PT sharing has split PMD PT locks David Hildenbrand
2024-07-28 12:47   ` Mike Rapoport
2024-07-26 15:07 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] powerpc/8xx: document and enforce that split PT locks are not used David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fe50cde6-dc9f-49b0-9a9a-0d07fb643617@bytedance.com \
    --to=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox