From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630D1C433E6 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:31:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD65320720 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:31:48 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DD65320720 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 6809A6B0002; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 04:31:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 6312F6B0005; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 04:31:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 5468A6B0006; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 04:31:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0054.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.54]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8EA6B0002 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 04:31:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin29.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA67B8248047 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:31:47 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77206566654.29.moon80_24032ba27085 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin29.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA3218086E2B for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:31:47 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: moon80_24032ba27085 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4974 Received: from out30-133.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-133.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.133]) by imf49.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:31:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R141e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01f04427;MF=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=4;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0U7FazRR_1598776298; Received: from IT-FVFX43SYHV2H.local(mailfrom:alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0U7FazRR_1598776298) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Sun, 30 Aug 2020 16:31:39 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: use add_page_to_lru_list()/page_lru()/page_off_lru() To: Yu Zhao Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton References: <20200827234202.4027996-1-yuzhao@google.com> <20200829181213.GA838419@google.com> From: Alex Shi Message-ID: Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 16:31:38 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200829181213.GA838419@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gbk X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: CFA3218086E2B X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: =D4=DA 2020/8/30 =C9=CF=CE=E72:12, Yu Zhao =D0=B4=B5=C0: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 05:42:01PM -0600, Yu Zhao wrote: >> This is a trivial but worth having clean-up patch. There should be >> no side effects except page->lru is temporarily poisoned after it's >> deleted but before it's added to the new list in move_pages_to_lru() >> (which is not a problem). >> >> Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao >=20 > Hi Alex, I just realized your > [v18,08/32] mm/vmscan: remove unnecessary lruvec adding > at > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11733123/ > also touches move_pages_to_lru(). I agree it's better not to add > a page we are going to free to the list in the first place. The > rest in this patch would be too trivial to be a separate one (on > top of yours). >=20 > So would you mind taking of the clean-up too in your series? I'll > drop this one then. Thanks. >=20 >> --- >> mm/swap.c | 4 +--- >> mm/vmscan.c | 14 ++++---------- >> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c >> index 40bf20a75278..2735ecf0f566 100644 >> --- a/mm/swap.c >> +++ b/mm/swap.c >> @@ -597,11 +597,9 @@ static void lru_lazyfree_fn(struct page *page, st= ruct lruvec *lruvec, >> { >> if (PageLRU(page) && PageAnon(page) && PageSwapBacked(page) && >> !PageSwapCache(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) { >> - bool active =3D PageActive(page); >> int nr_pages =3D thp_nr_pages(page); >> =20 >> - del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec, >> - LRU_INACTIVE_ANON + active); >> + del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec, page_lru(page)); >> ClearPageActive(page); >> ClearPageReferenced(page); >> /* >> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c >> index 99e1796eb833..b479ced26cd3 100644 >> --- a/mm/vmscan.c >> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c >> @@ -1845,13 +1845,12 @@ static unsigned noinline_for_stack move_pages_= to_lru(struct lruvec *lruvec, >> int nr_pages, nr_moved =3D 0; >> LIST_HEAD(pages_to_free); >> struct page *page; >> - enum lru_list lru; >> =20 >> while (!list_empty(list)) { >> page =3D lru_to_page(list); >> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(page), page); >> + list_del(&page->lru); >> if (unlikely(!page_evictable(page))) { >> - list_del(&page->lru); >> spin_unlock_irq(&pgdat->lru_lock); >> putback_lru_page(page); >> spin_lock_irq(&pgdat->lru_lock); >> @@ -1860,16 +1859,10 @@ static unsigned noinline_for_stack move_pages_= to_lru(struct lruvec *lruvec, >> lruvec =3D mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, pgdat); >> =20 >> SetPageLRU(page); >> - lru =3D page_lru(page); >> - >> - nr_pages =3D thp_nr_pages(page); >> - update_lru_size(lruvec, lru, page_zonenum(page), nr_pages); >> - list_move(&page->lru, &lruvec->lists[lru]); >> + add_page_to_lru_list(page, lruvec, page_lru(page)); >> =20 >> if (put_page_testzero(page)) { >> - __ClearPageLRU(page); it's interesting to know the PageLRU left has no bad impact in real life.= =20 it justs seems a path confliction with my that patch.=20 >> - __ClearPageActive(page); >> - del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec, lru); >> + del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec, page_off_lru(page)); >> =20 >> if (unlikely(PageCompound(page))) { >> spin_unlock_irq(&pgdat->lru_lock); >> @@ -1878,6 +1871,7 @@ static unsigned noinline_for_stack move_pages_to= _lru(struct lruvec *lruvec, >> } else >> list_add(&page->lru, &pages_to_free); >> } else { >> + nr_pages =3D thp_nr_pages(page); >> nr_moved +=3D nr_pages; >> if (PageActive(page)) >> workingset_age_nonresident(lruvec, nr_pages); >> --=20 >> 2.28.0.402.g5ffc5be6b7-goog >>