From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: hugetlb: Add Kconfig option to set default nr_overcommit_hugepages
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 11:12:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fd1c3a84-d3e6-906f-57b0-25eae0933b68@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <71834e10-098c-7d15-b9d4-36d33a57499c@google.com>
On 11.06.23 07:20, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Josh Triplett wrote:
>
>> The default kernel configuration does not allow any huge page allocation
>> until after setting nr_hugepages or nr_overcommit_hugepages to a
>> non-zero value; without setting those, mmap attempts with MAP_HUGETLB
>> will always fail with -ENOMEM. nr_overcommit_hugepages allows userspace
>> to attempt to allocate huge pages at runtime, succeeding if the kernel
>> can find or assemble a free huge page.
>>
>> Provide a Kconfig option to make nr_overcommit_hugepages default to
>> unlimited, which permits userspace to always attempt huge page
>> allocation on a best-effort basis. This makes it easier and more
>> worthwhile for random applications and libraries to opportunistically
>> attempt MAP_HUGETLB allocations without special configuration.
>>
>> In particular, current versions of liburing with IORING_SETUP_NO_MMAP
>> attempt to allocate the rings in a huge page. This seems likely to lead
>> to more applications and libraries attempting to use huge pages.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
>
> Why not do this in an initscript?
>
> Or, if absolutely necessary, a kernel command line parameter?
>
> A Kconfig option to set a default value to be ULONG_MAX seems strange if
> you can just write the value to procfs.
>
Agreed, not to mention that huge pages in some environment can cause
trouble (some architectures -- or with gigantic huge pages -- don't
support huge page migration and you can run into trouble with
ZONE_MOVABLE or MIGRATE_CMA, because you'll end up "consuming" all
memory for unmovable allocations in the system), and we shouldn't
advocate the use of unlimited overcommit for huge pages ...
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-12 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-10 1:21 Josh Triplett
2023-06-11 5:20 ` David Rientjes
2023-06-12 9:12 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2023-06-12 16:42 ` Mike Kravetz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fd1c3a84-d3e6-906f-57b0-25eae0933b68@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox