Re: [PATCH v3] mm/memory-failure: remove the selection of RAS

["David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@kernel.org>]

On 11/19/25 10:59, Xie Yuanbin wrote:
> The commit 97f0b13452198290799f ("tracing: add trace event for
> memory-failure") introduces the selection of RAS in memory-failure.
> This commit is just a tracing feature; in reality, there is no dependency
> between memory-failure and RAS. RAS increases the size of the bzImage
> image by 8k, which is very valuable for embedded devices.
> 
> Move the memory-failure traceing code from ras_event.h to
> memory-failure.h and remove the selection of RAS.
> 
> v2->v3: https://lore.kernel.org/20251104072306.100738-3-xieyuanbin1@huawei.com
>    - Change define TRACE_SYSTEM from ras to memory_failure
>    - Add include/trace/events/memory-failure.h to
>      "HWPOISON MEMORY FAILURE HANDLING" section in MAINTAINERS
>    - Rebase to latest linux-next source
> 
> v1->v2: https://lore.kernel.org/20251103033536.52234-2-xieyuanbin1@huawei.com
>    - Move the memory-failure traceing code from ras_event.h to
>      memory-failure.h
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xie Yuanbin <xieyuanbin1@huawei.com>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@kernel.org>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
> ---
>   MAINTAINERS                           |  1 +
>   include/ras/ras_event.h               | 87 ------------------------
>   include/trace/events/memory-failure.h | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   mm/Kconfig                            |  1 -
>   mm/memory-failure.c                   |  5 +-
>   5 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 include/trace/events/memory-failure.h
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 7310d9ca0370..43d6eb95fb05 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -11631,10 +11631,11 @@ R:	Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>
>   L:	linux-mm@kvack.org
>   S:	Maintained
>   F:	include/linux/memory-failure.h
>   F:	mm/hwpoison-inject.c
>   F:	mm/memory-failure.c
> +F:	include/trace/events/memory-failure.

These are ordered alphabetically, so it should be further up next to the 
other include.

With that

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@kernel.org>

-- 
Cheers

David