From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>,
James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Jiaqi Yan <jiaqiyan@google.com>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] HGM for hugetlbfs
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 17:15:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc581959-1dd3-7b87-85bf-7538bc8d582d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZIiEQ+cMPGkIcAEN@ziepe.ca>
On 13.06.23 16:59, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 09:10:15PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 08:34:10AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 08.06.23 02:02, David Rientjes wrote:
>>>> While people have proposed 1GB THP support in the past, it was nacked, in
>>>> part, because of the suggestion to just use existing 1GB support in
>>>> hugetlb instead :)
>>>
>>> Yes, because I still think that the use for "transparent" (for the user)
>>> nowadays is very limited and not worth the complexity.
>>>
>>> IMHO, what you really want is a pool of large pages that (guarantees about
>>> availability and nodes) and fine control about who gets these pages. That's
>>> what hugetlb provides.
>>>
>>> In contrast to THP, you don't want to allow for
>>> * Partially mmap, mremap, munmap, mprotect them
>>> * Partially sharing then / COW'ing them
>>> * Partially mixing them with other anon pages (MADV_DONTNEED + refault)
>>> * Exclude them from some features KSM/swap
>>> * (swap them out and eventually split them for that)
>>>
>>> Because you don't want to get these pages PTE-mapped by the system *unless*
>>> there is a real reason (HGM, hwpoison) -- you want guarantees. Once such a
>>> page is PTE-mapped, you only want to collapse in place.
>>>
>>> But you don't want special-HGM, you simply want the core to PTE-map them
>>> like a (file) THP.
>>>
>>> IMHO, getting that realized much easier would be if we wouldn't have to care
>>> about some of the hugetlb complexity I raised (MAP_PRIVATE, PMD sharing),
>>> but maybe there is a way ...
>>
>> I favour a more evolutionary than revolutionary approach. That is,
>> I think it's acceptable to add new features to hugetlbfs _if_ they're
>> combined with cleanup work that gets hugetlbfs closer to the main mm.
>> This is why I harp on things like pagewalk that currently need special
>> handling for hugetlb -- that's pointless; they should just be treated as
>> large folios. GUP handles hugetlb separately too, and I'm not sure why.
>
> Yes, this echo's my feelings too.
>
> Making all the special core-mm cases around hugetlb even more
> complicated with HGM seems like a non-starter.
>
> We need to get to a point where the core-mm handles all the PTE
> programming and supports arbitary order folios in the page tables
> uniformly for everyone.
>
> hugetlb is just a special high order folio provider.
>
> Get rid of all the special PTE formats, unique arch code, and special
> code in gup.c/pagewalkers/etc that supports hugetlbfs.
>
> I think the general path to do that is to make the core-mm and all the
> hugetlb supporting arches support a core-code path for working with
> high order folios in page tables.
>
> Maybe this is demo'd & tested with a temporary/simplified hugetlbfs
> uAPI. When the core MM and all the arches are ready you switch
> hugetlbfs to use the new core API and deleted all the page walk
> special cases.
>
> From there you can then teach the core code to do all the splitting
> and whatever that you want.
Yes, that's my hope.
As I said, some existing oddities like PMD sharing (VM use-cases don't
really require that) and MAP_PRIVATE handling (again, VMs don't really
require that) could make the conversion more problematic ... IMHO
So maybe we should really factor out the core hugetlb pooling logic and
write a simplified v2 implementation that integrates nicely with the VM
without all of these oddities.
We can then either port some of these oddities step by step from v1 to
v2 or replace them by something better (for example: if we really want
MAP_PRIVATE, then just do it like with any other file and use ordinary
anon (THP) ).
One day, we can then just switch to v2 and remove v1. If we manage
without any uABI changes, great.
Doing all the conversion in-place could turn out extremely painful and
take much longer ... but I might be just taught otherwise.
As you say, hugetlb should just be a special folio provider ...
We can discuss tomorrow.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-13 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-06 19:19 Mike Kravetz
2023-03-14 15:37 ` James Houghton
2023-04-12 1:44 ` David Rientjes
2023-05-24 20:26 ` James Houghton
2023-05-26 3:00 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <20230602172723.GA3941@monkey>
2023-06-06 22:40 ` David Rientjes
2023-06-07 7:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-06-07 7:51 ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-06-07 8:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-06-07 22:06 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-06-08 0:02 ` David Rientjes
2023-06-08 6:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-06-08 18:50 ` Yang Shi
2023-06-08 21:23 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-06-09 1:57 ` Zi Yan
2023-06-09 15:17 ` Pasha Tatashin
2023-06-09 19:04 ` Ankur Arora
2023-06-09 19:57 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-06-08 20:10 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-06-09 2:59 ` David Rientjes
2023-06-13 14:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-13 15:15 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2023-06-13 15:45 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-08 21:54 ` [Lsf-pc] " Dan Williams
2023-06-08 22:35 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-06-09 3:36 ` Dan Williams
2023-06-09 20:20 ` James Houghton
2023-06-13 15:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-06-07 14:40 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fc581959-1dd3-7b87-85bf-7538bc8d582d@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jiaqiyan@google.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox