From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
shy828301@gmail.com, david@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Extend migrate_misplaced_page() to support batch migration
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 11:13:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc31bade-e15a-3cbf-7ed8-5b322374afe8@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pm3fbxos.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 8/22/2023 10:47 AM, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Currently, on our ARM servers with NUMA enabled, we found the cross-die latency
>> is a little larger that will significantly impact the workload's performance.
>> So on ARM servers we will rely on the NUMA balancing to avoid the cross-die
>> accessing. And I posted a patchset[1] to support speculative numa fault to
>> improve the NUMA balancing's performance according to the principle of data
>> locality. Moreover, thanks to Huang Ying's patchset[2], which introduced batch
>> migration as a way to reduce the cost of TLB flush, and it will also benefit
>> the migration of multiple pages all at once during NUMA balancing.
>>
>> So we plan to continue to support batch migration in do_numa_page() to improve
>> the NUMA balancing's performance, but before adding complicated batch migration
>> algorithm for NUMA balancing, some cleanup and preparation work need to do firstly,
>> which are done in this patch set. In short, this patchset extends the
>> migrate_misplaced_page() interface to support batch migration, and no functional
>> changes intended.
>>
>> In addition, these cleanup can also benefit the compound page's NUMA balancing,
>> which was discussed in previous thread[3]. IIUC, for the compound page's NUMA
>> balancing, it is possible that partial pages were successfully migrated, so it is
>> necessary to return the number of pages that were successfully migrated from
>> migrate_misplaced_page().
>
> But I don't find the return number is used except as bool now.
As I said above, this is a preparation for batch migration and compound
page NUMA balancing in future.
In addition, after looking into the THP' NUMA migration, I found this
change is necessary for THP migration. Since it is possible that partial
subpages were successfully migrated if the THP is split, so below THP
numa fault statistics is not always correct:
if (page_nid != NUMA_NO_NODE)
task_numa_fault(last_cpupid, page_nid, HPAGE_PMD_NR,
flags);
I will try to fix this in next version.
> Per my understanding, I still don't find much value of the changes
> except as preparation for batch migration in NUMA balancing. So I still
IMO, only patch 3 is just a preparation for batch migration, but other
patches are some cleanups for migrate_misplaced_page(). I can drop the
preparation patches in this series and revise the commit message.
> think it's better to wait for the whole series. Where we can check why
> these changes are necessary for batch migration. And I think that you
> will provide some number to justify the batch migration, including pros
> and cons.
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Huang, Ying
>
>> This series is based on the latest mm-unstable(d226b59b30cc).
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1639306956.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com/t/#mc45929849b5d0e29b5fdd9d50425f8e95b8f2563
>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230213123444.155149-1-ying.huang@intel.com/T/#u
>> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/f8d47176-03a8-99bf-a813-b5942830fd73@arm.com/
>>
>> Changes from v1:
>> - Move page validation into a new function suggested by Huang Ying.
>> - Change numamigrate_isolate_page() to boolean type.
>> - Update some commit message.
>>
>> Baolin Wang (4):
>> mm: migrate: factor out migration validation into
>> numa_page_can_migrate()
>> mm: migrate: move the numamigrate_isolate_page() into do_numa_page()
>> mm: migrate: change migrate_misplaced_page() to support multiple pages
>> migration
>> mm: migrate: change to return the number of pages migrated
>> successfully
>>
>> include/linux/migrate.h | 15 +++++++---
>> mm/huge_memory.c | 23 +++++++++++++--
>> mm/internal.h | 1 +
>> mm/memory.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> mm/migrate.c | 64 +++++++++--------------------------------
>> 5 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-24 3:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-22 0:53 Baolin Wang
2023-08-22 0:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: migrate: factor out migration validation into numa_page_can_migrate() Baolin Wang
2023-08-22 0:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: migrate: move the numamigrate_isolate_page() into do_numa_page() Baolin Wang
2023-08-22 9:02 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-08-24 3:14 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-22 0:53 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mm: migrate: change migrate_misplaced_page() to support multiple pages migration Baolin Wang
2023-08-22 0:53 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mm: migrate: change to return the number of pages migrated successfully Baolin Wang
2023-08-22 2:47 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Extend migrate_misplaced_page() to support batch migration Huang, Ying
2023-08-24 3:13 ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2023-08-24 4:51 ` Huang, Ying
2023-08-24 6:26 ` Baolin Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fc31bade-e15a-3cbf-7ed8-5b322374afe8@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox