linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
To: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	 Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
	 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Tools for explaining memory mappings/usage/pressure
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 14:57:57 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fba2dbce-d4e2-a838-2f17-aa1592787bd4@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <549a3199-2eb5-41b1-a03b-9cc571e72e03@kernel.org>

On Mon, 22 Jul 2024, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote:

> On 7/6/24 10:55 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I'm trying to crowdsource information on open source tools that can be 
> > used directly by customers to explain memory mappings, usage, pressure, 
> > etc.
> > 
> > We encounter both internal and external users that are looking for this 
> > insight and it often requires significant engineering time to collect data 
> > to make any conclusions.
> > 
> > A recent example is an external customer that recently upgraded their 
> > userspace and started to run into memcg constrained memory pressure that 
> > wasn't previously observed.  After handing off a hacky script to run in 
> > the background, it was immediately obvious that the source of the direct 
> > reclaim was all of the MADV_FREE memory that was sitting around.  
> > Converting to MADV_DONTNEED solved their issue.
> 
> BTW, was this reported/fixed upstream? Sounds like a bug to me that would
> better be fixed than suggesting the MADV_DONTNEED workaround to everyone
> from now on.
> 

From the kernel perspective, it was working as intended: nearly half of 
the customer's memory (32GB VM instance) was lazily freeable under memory 
pressure and they were not expecting any reclaim stalls for future page 
faults.  A recent upgrade of their userspace had switched heap freeing in 
a library from MADV_DONTNEED -> MADV_FREE implicitly without the user's 
direct knowledge :/


  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-22 21:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-06 20:55 David Rientjes
2024-07-07 15:44 ` SeongJae Park
2024-07-08 13:50 ` Dan Schatzberg
2024-07-21 23:05   ` David Rientjes
2024-07-22 22:15     ` Dan Schatzberg
2024-07-22  9:05 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2024-07-22 21:57   ` David Rientjes [this message]
2024-12-30  8:15 ` Raghavendra K T

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fba2dbce-d4e2-a838-2f17-aa1592787bd4@google.com \
    --to=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox