From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Make ksize() a reporting-only function
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 13:53:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fabffcfd-4e7f-a4b8-69ac-2865ead36598@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221022180455.never.023-kees@kernel.org>
On 10/22/22 20:08, Kees Cook wrote:
> With all "silently resizing" callers of ksize() refactored, remove the
> logic in ksize() that would allow it to be used to effectively change
> the size of an allocation (bypassing __alloc_size hints, etc). Users
> wanting this feature need to either use kmalloc_size_roundup() before an
> allocation, or use krealloc() directly.
>
> For kfree_sensitive(), move the unpoisoning logic inline. Replace the
> some of the partially open-coded ksize() in __do_krealloc with ksize()
> now that it doesn't perform unpoisoning.
>
> Adjust the KUnit tests to match the new ksize() behavior.
>
> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
> Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>
> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
> Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
> Cc: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Cc: kasan-dev@googlegroups.com
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> ---
> This requires at least this be landed first:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221021234713.you.031-kees@kernel.org/
Don't we need all parts to have landed first, even if the skbuff one is the
most prominent?
> I suspect given that is the most central ksize() user, this ksize()
> fix might be best to land through the netdev tree...
> ---
> mm/kasan/kasan_test.c | 8 +++++---
> mm/slab_common.c | 33 ++++++++++++++-------------------
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/kasan/kasan_test.c b/mm/kasan/kasan_test.c
> index 0d59098f0876..cb5c54adb503 100644
> --- a/mm/kasan/kasan_test.c
> +++ b/mm/kasan/kasan_test.c
> @@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ static void kasan_global_oob_left(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, *(volatile char *)p);
> }
>
> -/* Check that ksize() makes the whole object accessible. */
> +/* Check that ksize() does NOT unpoison whole object. */
> static void ksize_unpoisons_memory(struct kunit *test)
> {
> char *ptr;
> @@ -791,15 +791,17 @@ static void ksize_unpoisons_memory(struct kunit *test)
>
> ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
> +
> real_size = ksize(ptr);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_GT(test, real_size, size);
>
> OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
>
> /* This access shouldn't trigger a KASAN report. */
> - ptr[size] = 'x';
> + ptr[size - 1] = 'x';
>
> /* This one must. */
> - KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, ((volatile char *)ptr)[real_size]);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, ((volatile char *)ptr)[real_size - 1]);
>
> kfree(ptr);
> }
> diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
> index 33b1886b06eb..eabd66fcabd0 100644
> --- a/mm/slab_common.c
> +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
> @@ -1333,11 +1333,11 @@ __do_krealloc(const void *p, size_t new_size, gfp_t flags)
> void *ret;
> size_t ks;
>
> - /* Don't use instrumented ksize to allow precise KASAN poisoning. */
> + /* Check for double-free before calling ksize. */
> if (likely(!ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(p))) {
> if (!kasan_check_byte(p))
> return NULL;
> - ks = kfence_ksize(p) ?: __ksize(p);
> + ks = ksize(p);
> } else
> ks = 0;
>
> @@ -1405,8 +1405,10 @@ void kfree_sensitive(const void *p)
> void *mem = (void *)p;
>
> ks = ksize(mem);
> - if (ks)
> + if (ks) {
> + kasan_unpoison_range(mem, ks);
> memzero_explicit(mem, ks);
> + }
> kfree(mem);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kfree_sensitive);
> @@ -1415,10 +1417,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kfree_sensitive);
> * ksize - get the actual amount of memory allocated for a given object
> * @objp: Pointer to the object
> *
> - * kmalloc may internally round up allocations and return more memory
> + * kmalloc() may internally round up allocations and return more memory
> * than requested. ksize() can be used to determine the actual amount of
> - * memory allocated. The caller may use this additional memory, even though
> - * a smaller amount of memory was initially specified with the kmalloc call.
> + * allocated memory. The caller may NOT use this additional memory, unless
> + * it calls krealloc(). To avoid an alloc/realloc cycle, callers can use
> + * kmalloc_size_roundup() to find the size of the associated kmalloc bucket.
> * The caller must guarantee that objp points to a valid object previously
> * allocated with either kmalloc() or kmem_cache_alloc(). The object
> * must not be freed during the duration of the call.
> @@ -1427,13 +1430,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kfree_sensitive);
> */
> size_t ksize(const void *objp)
> {
> - size_t size;
> -
> /*
> - * We need to first check that the pointer to the object is valid, and
> - * only then unpoison the memory. The report printed from ksize() is
> - * more useful, then when it's printed later when the behaviour could
> - * be undefined due to a potential use-after-free or double-free.
> + * We need to first check that the pointer to the object is valid.
> + * The KASAN report printed from ksize() is more useful, then when
> + * it's printed later when the behaviour could be undefined due to
> + * a potential use-after-free or double-free.
> *
> * We use kasan_check_byte(), which is supported for the hardware
> * tag-based KASAN mode, unlike kasan_check_read/write().
> @@ -1447,13 +1448,7 @@ size_t ksize(const void *objp)
> if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(objp)) || !kasan_check_byte(objp))
> return 0;
>
> - size = kfence_ksize(objp) ?: __ksize(objp);
> - /*
> - * We assume that ksize callers could use whole allocated area,
> - * so we need to unpoison this area.
> - */
> - kasan_unpoison_range(objp, size);
> - return size;
> + return kfence_ksize(objp) ?: __ksize(objp);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ksize);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-25 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-22 18:08 Kees Cook
2022-10-24 6:13 ` kernel test robot
2022-10-25 11:53 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2022-10-25 18:38 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-27 19:05 ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-10-27 19:13 ` Kees Cook
2022-10-27 19:15 ` Andrey Konovalov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fabffcfd-4e7f-a4b8-69ac-2865ead36598@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox