From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145F6C43217 for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 19:39:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 8CE168E0001; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 15:39:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 8562A6B0073; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 15:39:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 6A8E18E0001; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 15:39:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0016.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.16]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52CD16B0071 for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 15:39:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin29.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 143DC140172 for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 19:39:06 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79980651492.29.916471D Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06b.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by imf24.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1203918001D for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 19:39:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1664825945; x=1696361945; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KSXJiNJHu5j7SgNbcobNcS6+T8nWWfA9o3cdPWEIKsc=; b=ONnYAria6LP1l+JwYIaACg6KUp9MfZXRW9z9+qT/1jxtMfA3mPIrEEEq cJrbvYu5g/8D2ufcT9Esu1h7OxhqYlhRO+TmEikXWEVZFAEVpso/mJbMg 6waERNqH+nIL0IwbayZMxYuR8SsD3asNg9Gn3ZwDfEcz/3SGsfiU/AejX FVSZRKEEocog1PBTrnEsHqhsTJe2lsQ7MHKKQ64sSrE9jgYdVzsgFnDKb wGUD0HXswQHllo6Ug90H0J5pP7LACoDqqqmwiwqCMKwcUDJNKdl9VYBXM HIc5nRQNxYvJAMBLpk6/ll0rSCKg/gqfxTRe/mc226R+31KAunUJvh4bs A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10489"; a="364642449" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,366,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="364642449" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Oct 2022 12:39:03 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10489"; a="574771381" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,366,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="574771381" Received: from akashred-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.212.139.217]) ([10.212.139.217]) by orsmga003-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Oct 2022 12:39:00 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 12:39:00 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/39] Documentation/x86: Add CET description Content-Language: en-US To: John Hubbard , Bagas Sanjaya , Rick Edgecombe Cc: x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Borislav Petkov , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Florian Weimer , "H . J . Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek , Peter Zijlstra , Randy Dunlap , "Ravi V . Shankar" , Weijiang Yang , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , joao.moreira@intel.com, John Allen , kcc@google.com, eranian@google.com, rppt@kernel.org, jamorris@linux.microsoft.com, dethoma@microsoft.com, Yu-cheng Yu References: <20220929222936.14584-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> <20220929222936.14584-2-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> <4102e1ef-c0da-37b7-6b54-89027fd9d080@nvidia.com> From: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: <4102e1ef-c0da-37b7-6b54-89027fd9d080@nvidia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf24.hostedemail.com; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=ONnYAria; spf=pass (imf24.hostedemail.com: domain of dave.hansen@intel.com designates 134.134.136.31 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dave.hansen@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1664825945; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=TgLxTzKr8jUV3MNpnllwn50RGRRYxE4ngYWlluuFaQ3q7Rm4nwttXNWuKYEj99vN14kIT/ mmuuWKIqjXm0gPc4zAyypVWMsyQyHRiWWoVeldS9X7ecoG6FTdHFgfvaUWCScYZe7IRSiA I/vk695Agxb2A9M+ISj8Lp3wKtOvHzg= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1664825945; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=4y5aGcG503/FC0wHGN1Qy1gehxc1wB2y2jfocx1fDDs=; b=4AQz/cymt8I40dRCdeBFWxitiGRoANgz+QS1oLtv6pPsNRbh8LSWqZWasnxJft3nVrQ4c2 aLH3K/fQa354cfw0n6O8fT9LiDBakB52CckmMuHsV09NYEpsa+2FMsMpoqrQD7MlLq5hoK ONVyoqQKMyzGUo86RoZdRBsOzXI8tzU= X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1203918001D X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf24.hostedemail.com; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=ONnYAria; spf=pass (imf24.hostedemail.com: domain of dave.hansen@intel.com designates 134.134.136.31 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dave.hansen@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com X-Stat-Signature: 3hk3bpzpaxrp158bug1pfjwie6or815d X-HE-Tag: 1664825944-177629 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 10/3/22 12:35, John Hubbard wrote: > It's always a judgment call, as to whether to use something like ``CALL` > or just plain CALL. Here, I'd like to opine that that the benefits of > ``CALL`` are very small, whereas plain text in cet.rst has been made > significantly worse. So the result is, "this is not worth it". I'm definitely in this camp as well. Unless the markup *really* adds to readability, just leave it alone.