From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
Aboorva Devarajan <aboorvad@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drivers/base/node: merge unregister_one_node() and unregister_node() to a single function.
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 21:19:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa2272b9-13f2-464f-bb95-72fd31f1dcf9@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c99d97e253378455f1b3b7bec5b0c830d4e73074.1758736423.git.donettom@linux.ibm.com>
Le 24/09/2025 à 20:40, Donet Tom a écrit :
> unregister_one_node() and unregister_node() are small functions.
> This patch merges them into a single function named unregister_node()
> to improve code readability.
Same comment than patch 1. It is not only because they are small that
you merge them, it is primarily because unregister_node() only has one
caller.
>
> No functional changes are introduced.
>
> Signed-off-by: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/node.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++--------------------
> include/linux/node.h | 6 ++----
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c
> index eab620e29c78..d460c1675c77 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/node.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/node.c
> @@ -638,23 +638,6 @@ static void node_device_release(struct device *dev)
> kfree(to_node(dev));
> }
>
> -/**
> - * unregister_node - unregister a node device
> - * @node: node going away
> - *
> - * Unregisters a node device @node. All the devices on the node must be
> - * unregistered before calling this function.
> - */
> -void unregister_node(struct node *node)
> -{
> - hugetlb_unregister_node(node);
> - compaction_unregister_node(node);
> - reclaim_unregister_node(node);
> - node_remove_accesses(node);
> - node_remove_caches(node);
> - device_unregister(&node->dev);
> -}
> -
> struct node *node_devices[MAX_NUMNODES];
>
> /*
> @@ -887,12 +870,26 @@ int register_node(int nid)
> return error;
> }
>
> -void unregister_one_node(int nid)
> +/**
> + * unregister_node - unregister a node device
> + * @nid: nid of the node going away
> + *
> + * Unregisters the node device at node id @nid. All the devices on the
> + * node must be unregistered before calling this function.
> + */
> +void unregister_node(int nid)
> {
> - if (!node_devices[nid])
> + struct node *node = node_devices[nid];
> +
> + if (!node)
> return;
>
> - unregister_node(node_devices[nid]);
> + hugetlb_unregister_node(node);
> + compaction_unregister_node(node);
> + reclaim_unregister_node(node);
> + node_remove_accesses(node);
> + node_remove_caches(node);
> + device_unregister(&node->dev);
> node_devices[nid] = NULL;
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/node.h b/include/linux/node.h
> index 4dcf876cd0b4..d721127964b3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/node.h
> +++ b/include/linux/node.h
> @@ -124,8 +124,6 @@ static inline void register_memory_blocks_under_nodes(void)
> }
> #endif
>
> -extern void unregister_node(struct node *node);
> -
> struct node_notify {
> int nid;
> };
> @@ -169,7 +167,7 @@ static inline int hotplug_node_notifier(notifier_fn_t fn, int pri)
> extern void node_dev_init(void);
> /* Core of the node registration - only memory hotplug should use this */
> extern int register_node(int nid);
> -extern void unregister_one_node(int nid);
> +extern void unregister_node(int nid);
No 'extern' on function prototypes.
> extern int register_cpu_under_node(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int nid);
> extern int unregister_cpu_under_node(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int nid);
> extern void unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk);
> @@ -185,7 +183,7 @@ static inline int register_node(int nid)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> -static inline int unregister_one_node(int nid)
> +static inline int unregister_node(int nid)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 6c050d867031..94a8f6e8811a 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1596,7 +1596,7 @@ int add_memory_resource(int nid, struct resource *res, mhp_t mhp_flags)
> error:
> if (new_node) {
> node_set_offline(nid);
> - unregister_one_node(nid);
> + unregister_node(nid);
> }
> error_memblock_remove:
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK))
> @@ -2201,7 +2201,7 @@ void try_offline_node(int nid)
> * node now.
> */
> node_set_offline(nid);
> - unregister_one_node(nid);
> + unregister_node(nid);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(try_offline_node);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-24 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-24 18:40 [PATCH 0/2] drivers/base/node: fold node register and unregister functions Donet Tom
2025-09-24 18:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] drivers/base/node: merge register_one_node() and register_node() to a single function Donet Tom
2025-09-24 19:15 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-09-25 5:01 ` Donet Tom
2025-09-25 8:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-25 9:34 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-09-25 9:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-25 13:21 ` Donet Tom
2025-09-25 13:20 ` Donet Tom
2025-09-24 18:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] drivers/base/node: merge unregister_one_node() and unregister_node() " Donet Tom
2025-09-24 19:19 ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2025-09-25 5:03 ` Donet Tom
2025-09-25 8:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-25 9:36 ` [PATCH 0/2] drivers/base/node: fold node register and unregister functions Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa2272b9-13f2-464f-bb95-72fd31f1dcf9@csgroup.eu \
--to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=aboorvad@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=donettom@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox