From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] s390/mm: fix mis-accounting of pgtable_bytes
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 03:47:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa0269be-48e5-c987-50b6-4dc94ac8f086@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181127073411.GA3625@osiris>
On 11/26/18 11:34 PM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 01:36:23PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:09:44AM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 07:31:49AM +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
>>>> Thanks for testing. Unfortunately Heiko reported another issue yesterday
>>>> with the patch applied. This time the other way around:
>>>>
>>>> BUG: non-zero pgtables_bytes on freeing mm: -16384
>>>>
>>>> I am trying to understand how this can happen. For now I would like to
>>>> keep the patch on hold in case they need another change.
>>>
>>> FWIW, Kirill: is there a reason why this "BUG:" output is done with
>>> pr_alert() and not with VM_BUG_ON() or one of the WARN*() variants?
>>>
>>> That would to get more information with DEBUG_VM and / or
>>> panic_on_warn=1 set. At least for automated testing it would be nice
>>> to have such triggers.
>>
>> Stack trace is not helpful there. It will always show the exit path which
>> is useless.
>
> So, even with the updated version of these patches I can flood dmesg
> and the console with
>
> BUG: non-zero pgtables_bytes on freeing mm: 16384
>
> messages with this complex reproducer on s390:
>
> echo "void main(void) {}" | gcc -m31 -xc -o compat - && ./compat
>
> Besides that this needs to be fixed, I'd really like to see this
> changed to either a printk_once() or a WARN_ON_ONCE() within
> check_mm() so that an arbitrary user cannot flood the console.
>
> E.g. something like the below. If there aren't any objections, I will
> provide a proper patch with changelog, etc.
>
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index 07cddff89c7b..d7aeec03c57f 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -647,8 +647,8 @@ static void check_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
> }
>
> if (mm_pgtables_bytes(mm))
> - pr_alert("BUG: non-zero pgtables_bytes on freeing mm: %ld\n",
> - mm_pgtables_bytes(mm));
> + printk_once(KERN_ALERT "BUG: non-zero pgtables_bytes on freeing mm: %ld\n",
> + mm_pgtables_bytes(mm));
>
pr_alert_once ?
Guenter
> #if defined(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) && !USE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS
> VM_BUG_ON_MM(mm->pmd_huge_pte, mm);
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-27 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-15 16:42 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] pgtable bytes mis-accounting v2 Martin Schwidefsky
2018-10-15 16:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: introduce mm_[p4d|pud|pmd]_folded Martin Schwidefsky
2018-10-31 9:02 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-31 9:35 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2018-10-31 9:48 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-15 16:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: add mm_pxd_folded checks to pgtable_bytes accounting functions Martin Schwidefsky
2018-10-31 9:04 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-15 16:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] s390/mm: fix mis-accounting of pgtable_bytes Martin Schwidefsky
2018-10-31 6:18 ` Li Wang
2018-10-31 6:31 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2018-10-31 6:43 ` Li Wang
2018-10-31 6:46 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2018-10-31 9:39 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2018-10-31 10:09 ` Heiko Carstens
2018-10-31 10:36 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-11-27 7:34 ` Heiko Carstens
2018-11-27 8:05 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-11-27 8:13 ` Heiko Carstens
2018-11-27 11:47 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2018-11-27 11:52 ` Heiko Carstens
2018-11-27 14:31 ` Martin Schwidefsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa0269be-48e5-c987-50b6-4dc94ac8f086@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=frankja@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liwang@redhat.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox