linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] mm: ioremap: Add arch_ioremap/iounmap()
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 22:53:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f9bbfe38-ce1d-b4c4-6acf-4b81e6587e2d@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a19S8CFxJKQo_8UXSKA0L8J40DsjL+u649oDhqUPHSW7A@mail.gmail.com>


On 2022/5/24 22:47, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 4:32 PM Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> wrote:
>> On 2022/5/24 20:37, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 10:25 AM Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>> Add special hook for architecture to verify or setup addr, size
>>>> or prot when ioremap() or iounmap(), which will make the generic
>>>> ioremap more useful.
>>>>
>>>>     arch_ioremap() return a pointer,
>>>>       - IS_ERR means return an error
>>>>       - NULL means continue to remap
>>>>       - a non-NULL, non-IS_ERR pointer is directly returned
>>>>     arch_iounmap() return a int value,
>>>>       - 0 means continue to vunmap
>>>>       - error code means skip vunmap and return directly
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
>>> I don't really like interfaces that mix error pointers and NULL pointer
>>> returns.
>>>
>>> Would it be possible to have a special error code other than NULL
>>> for the fallback case?
>> I don't find a good error code, maybe  ENOTSUPP, any better suggestion?
> I had another look at the resulting arm64 function, and it appears that
> you never actually return a non-error pointer here. If I didn't miss anything,
> I think the best way would be to change the return type to just indicate
> success or an error code, and drop the case of returning the actual result,
> and changing the function name accordingly.
>
> Would that work, or do you actually require returning an __iomem
> token from somewhere else?

Christoph  suggested in the first version,

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/Ymq2uX%2FY15HlIpo7@infradead.org/

>         Arnd
>
> .


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-24 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-19  8:25 [PATCH v3 0/6] arm64: Cleanup ioremap() and support ioremap_prot() Kefeng Wang
2022-05-19  8:25 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] ARM: mm: kill unused runtime hook arch_iounmap() Kefeng Wang
2022-05-19  8:51   ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-05-20 15:28   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-24  2:03     ` Kefeng Wang
2022-05-21 20:30   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-05-19  8:25 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] mm: ioremap: Use more sensibly name in ioremap_prot() Kefeng Wang
2022-05-19  8:25 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] mm: ioremap: Setup phys_addr of struct vm_struct Kefeng Wang
2022-05-19  8:25 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] mm: ioremap: Add arch_ioremap/iounmap() Kefeng Wang
2022-05-19 18:52   ` Andrew Morton
2022-05-20  1:22     ` Kefeng Wang
2022-05-23  3:57     ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-05-23 22:17   ` kernel test robot
2022-05-24  9:48     ` Kefeng Wang
2022-05-24 12:35       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-05-24 14:31         ` Kefeng Wang
2022-05-24 12:37   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-05-24 14:32     ` Kefeng Wang
2022-05-24 14:47       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-05-24 14:53         ` Kefeng Wang [this message]
2022-05-31  6:13           ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-01  1:05             ` Kefeng Wang
2022-05-19  8:25 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] arm64: mm: Convert to GENERIC_IOREMAP Kefeng Wang
2022-05-19  8:25 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] arm64: Add HAVE_IOREMAP_PROT support Kefeng Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f9bbfe38-ce1d-b4c4-6acf-4b81e6587e2d@huawei.com \
    --to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox