linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@redhat.com>
To: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@redhat.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
	vbabka@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
	mhocko@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] selftests/mm: fix va_high_addr_switch.sh return value
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 10:44:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8d1e504-2009-4bd6-b1b7-c98c1f49374a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251207122239.3228920-1-chuhu@redhat.com>

On 2025-12-07 07:22, Chunyu Hu wrote:
> Patch series "Fix va_high_addr_switch.sh test failure - again", v1.
> 
> There are two issues exist for the  va_high_addr_switch test. One issue is
> the test return value is ignored in va_high_addr_switch.sh. The second is
> the va_high_addr_switch requires 6 hugepages but it requires 5.
> 
> Besides that, the nr_hugepages setup in run_vmtests.sh for arm64 can be
> done in va_high_addr_switch.sh too.
> 
> This patch: (of 3)
> 
> The return value should be return value of va_high_addr_switch, otherwise
> a test failure would be silently ignored.
> 
> Fixes: d9d957bd7b61 ("selftests/mm: alloc hugepages in va_high_addr_switch test")
> CC: Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@redhat.com>

This fix is good, but there are two additional issues that need fixing
(maybe in separate patches):

1. In main() we do:

"""
         ret = run_test(testcases, sz_testcases);
         if (argc == 2 && !strcmp(argv[1], "--run-hugetlb"))
                 ret = run_test(hugetlb_testcases, sz_hugetlb_testcases);
"""

The second run_test() overwrites the return code of the first one, so if
the first fails and the second one succeeds, the test will report
success.

2. The following comment in va_high_addr_switch.sh is wrong in two
counts: there's an eligibility check for powerpc64 and the test doesn't
reject other architectures as it runs on arm64 as well.

"""
     # The test supports x86_64 and powerpc64. We currently have no useful
     # eligibility check for powerpc64, and the test itself will reject other
     # architectures.
"""

For this fix:

Reviewed-by: Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@redhat.com>

> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/mm/va_high_addr_switch.sh | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/va_high_addr_switch.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/va_high_addr_switch.sh
> index a7d4b02b21dd..f89fe078a8e6 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/va_high_addr_switch.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/va_high_addr_switch.sh
> @@ -114,4 +114,6 @@ save_nr_hugepages
>   # 4 keep_mapped pages, and one for tmp usage
>   setup_nr_hugepages 5
>   ./va_high_addr_switch --run-hugetlb
> +retcode=$?
>   restore_nr_hugepages
> +exit $retcode











      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-08 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-07 12:22 Chunyu Hu
2025-12-07 12:22 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] selftests/mm: allocate 6 hugepages in va_high_addr_switch.sh Chunyu Hu
2025-12-07 12:22   ` [PATCH v1 3/3] selftests/mm: remove arm64 nr_hugepages setup for va_high_addr_switch test Chunyu Hu
2025-12-08 15:48     ` Luiz Capitulino
2025-12-08 15:47   ` [PATCH v1 2/3] selftests/mm: allocate 6 hugepages in va_high_addr_switch.sh Luiz Capitulino
2025-12-08 15:44 ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f8d1e504-2009-4bd6-b1b7-c98c1f49374a@redhat.com \
    --to=luizcap@redhat.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chuhu@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox